Skip to main content

Homeward Street Journal

Page 1, above the fold, of the current May & June, 2017 HSJ
The Homeward Street Journal, a slim bimonthly publication that has been around for twenty years, has as its stated mission one of  "[alleviating] miscommunication between communities by educating the public about housing and poverty issues, and by giving homeless people a voice in the public forum."

Its REAL mission, at least in recent years, is clearly something different than the above, but is no less noble -- indeed, it is MORE noble. It wants homeless people in Greater Sacramento to have better lives and a pathway to get housing in the near future.

There are problems with HSJ in that it can be skimpy and dumpy and badly edited [in the current issue for May and June 2017, the mayor's first name is misspelled. Whoops.] and it will often fill what little space there is in the publication with articles that have absolutely nothing to do with Sacramento.. In the current edition the headline has to do with something going on in the legislature in Oregon. States operate independently; what may be happening in Oregon is fully apart from the hopes and dreams of California homeless folk surviving on the streets in Sacramento county.

A major positive thing about the publication is that a piece by Suzanne Hastings is often published in HSJ. Hastings writes in high-style. Her pieces are evocative, colorful, quirky, magical and delicious when she is in top form, as she nearly is in the current issue with her bottom-of-the-front-page piece, titled "Stake-Down 2017: 'Where am I supposed to Live'"

Here, the first paragraph from "Stake-Down 2017":
An ancient now dark neon "Diet Pepsi" sign sits frozen in mid revolution. The kind of sign that was prevalent in the 50's and 60's. It is all that's left of the Torpedo diner that once stood here. The normally vacant lot at 12th and C Streets was for a few hours to be turned into a small community.
A few edits, and what Hastings writes would be consistently brilliant: In the opening paragraph, above, I'm not keen on use of the word "ancient," though I don't have an alternate word in mind; "now dark" should be hyphenated; Diet Pepsi needn't be in quotes; And as for the last sentence, the lot was turned into a venue for the community; it wasn't turned into the community, itself.

Another problem the publication has is its cartoonish fonts.

At right is the headline used for Hastings' piece, which is a meaningful article-with-commentary about an event held for the purpose of aiding homeless people in knowing some or their rights, and for those who attended to bond such that they could forward the effort of getting housing. While we're told it was not a wholly serious function -- there was food! music! poetry! comedy! -- it certainly wasn't a cartoon.

There are places on-line where fonts can be purchased or, sometimes, had for free. Homeward Street Journal should upgrade its appearance. I think that Paula Lomazzi, the unaccredited Editor in Chief, should try to improve the publication's appearance. "How it looks" is not unimportant. Readers of HSJ make determinations about how serious and accurate and professional the publication is by the aesthetics.

Speaking of Paula, in the current issue of HSJ, she is the author of an important story about Mayor Darrell Steinberg and Joan Burke, L&F Director of Advocacy, joining forces in hope of enlarging the number of beds for homeless folk by changing current law such that perhaps 20 churches could each provide sleep space for perhaps 20 homeless people. Sleeping out on the street can be dangerous and it can be a bear. It is hard to work to create a better life for oneself if you haven't had a good-night's sleep after you open your eyes in the morning.

I think the church sleep space article -- that included mention of other important efforts to create increased night-shelter space for homeless folk -- is excellent and should not have been buried on page five.

In an important area, I have disagreements with Homeward Street Journal, generally. HSJ is the product of way, way, way, way far-leftist politics.

We are told on the upper-righthand corner of the 7th page in the current issue of HSJ -- and, no doubt there in the past many dozens of issues -- that ...
Homeward Street Journal has been publishing since 1997 as a nonprofit project of the Sacramento Homeless Organizing Committee, which is a member of the Sacramento Housing Alliance.
SHOC, an organization that Paula Lomazzi heads is (or was) staunchly Stalinist Communist. SHOC came into being after the California Communist Party disintegrated in the 1980s and a Stalinist group from that party, headed by Nelson Peery, created a new group called, simply, the Organizing Committee. Subgroups of the Organizing Committee were identifiable by (1) The city where they were centered and (2) by the grouping of people they concentrated on. Thus SACRAMENTO HOMELESS ORGANIZING COMMITTEE is the name that Paula's group was given (years before Paula came along to be its head person).

Now, to be a true Stalinist Communist you have to be readily in favor of murdering ten or a hundred million people, now and then. I do not believe Paula favors most -- and maybe none -- of the tenets of the Stalinist variant of Communism. She hasn't even murdered anybody that I know of. I have suggested to Paula that she should abandon SHOC or DESTROY IT IF SHE CAN, MERCIFULLY BLOW IT UP and create a new, wholesome charity that has no connection whatever to stinking Stalinist Communism, but she has not done that. Shame on you, Paula.


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…