Skip to main content

Libby Fernandez: NOT a Friend of Homeless People

written by Tom Armstrong

Not a Friend.
Loaf & Fish Director Libby Fernandez was profiled in an issue of the Sacramento Business Journal. In the piece she was quoted telling homeless-averse business people what they want to hear. The first and third paragraphs in the profile follow [emphases mine]:
"Loaves and Fishes is the heart of downtown," Sister Libby Fernandez said. "It's a welcoming place for the very poor and homeless, and gives them a place to be during the day. We serve an average of 650 poor and homeless people each day, and if they weren't here, they would be at other places downtown.
... "When people who are homeless are here they can use our restrooms, our showers, wash up, get their clothes cleaned." she said. They can use our telephones, sit in our part and just be, without disturbing other people and other businesses. They can socialize here, and get services and help here."
In his book Managing the Underclass in American Society(1), John Irvin wrote about how the REAL effort in many metropolises is not to help the poor or homeless, but to coral them, to run them around in circles, to waste their time and to keep them out of public view. Police -- prompted by politicians who are prompted by business people -- in metropolises where such a polity, called "Warehousing the Rabble," is extant -- endlessly roust the homeless and otherwise keep 'em out of "nice neighborhoods." Does that sound like Sacramento? Yes.

And you know it's true: Homeless people in Sacramento get ticketed and arrested for conduct and actions that conventional citizens, doing the same activities, would never be bothered about by the police. There are laws on the books that exclusively or near-exclusively are there targeting the homeless to reduce them to the status of docile cows.

Libby, with her quotes in the Biz Journal, proves her fealty to the Warehousing the Rabble philosophy and the business community, in stark opposition to suffering homeless people. She is certainly no friend of the homeless. It's all a charade. She shows that she does not support the right of homeless folk to be treated the same as conventional Sacramento citizens.

Make no mistake, Libby is well known for delivering radically differing messages to suit the different audiences she addresses. It's called duplicity and Libby is shameless at it. To the business world, she's dutiful at keeping the stinky homeless away from the gentile public. To donors and volunteers, she is Mother Teresa, aiding the wretched. To the homeless, she pretends to be a champion of the poor. And to other groups, like the employees at Loaves & Fishes, the Jesuit volunteers, and the L&F Board of Directors, she has yet other masks to hide behind.

A change at the top at Loaves & Fishes is way, way, way overdue. It is time, too, to end the duplicity and for new management at Loaves & Fishes to embrace a new policy: one of compassion and genuine interest in helping homeless people find meaning in their lives and pathways to happiness in apartments of their own.
---------------------------------
(1)  Full title: The Jail: Managing the Underclass in American Society.



Comments

Unknown said…
It's such a hard thing to figure out a solution to homelessness. I work for a non-profit and it's our goal to provide value for our volunteers, so we send them to Loaves and Fishes and we have never had a problem with them. Hopefully the city gets its act together in the next few years. You can see our website at http://teamgiving.org/volunteer-sacramento/.

Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
"
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/marcos-breton/#storylink= It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "Cécile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…