Skip to main content

Is Mercy Housing, like the building at 7th & H streets, downtown, a good model for Homeless Housing elsewhere?

In a Bee article three days ago, that I consider to be very important, “Sacramento region stands to gain ‘tens of millions’ for homeless people reporter Anita Chabria wrote that, the The Mercy Housing complex at Seventh and H streets in Sacramento was “an integrated project” that Ben Metcalf, director of the California Department of Housing and Community Development, lauded as an example of an apartment complex that doesn’t feel “institutional, “is just delightful,” and "doesn’t raise neighborhood concerns.”

Mercy Housing at 7th & H Sts.
It is explained to readers that the term “integrated model” means housing that “incorporates units for the homeless and mentally ill into projects with mainstream and affordable housing.” By having a tenancy population that is widely varied, funding for apartment complexes can come from diverse pools of money which could get housing for homeless and mentally challenged individuals into more neighborhoods. This, Metcalf calls, “the wide-ranging approach.”

City homeless services coordinator Emily Halcon is quoted in the article, saying, “It’s a difficult package to put together, but theoretically it’s the best model.” Halcon’s words are not a full-throated endorsement of the “integrated model” and a “wide-ranging approach” or that the Mercy Housing complex is the best example of what should be roughly duplicated through-out the city and county, but it does seem that Mercy Housing is, for the moment -- well in advance of a time when the county has the funds to create housing and speedily place people in apartments -- a place that deserves scrutiny to examine its merits and flaws to facilitate further thinking on “what’s the very best thing that should be done.”

Are those now living at Mercy Housing happy?

Just over a year ago, I received an email from a friend who was living in Mercy and is there still so far as I know. I quote him below, deleting some of the content only in service of brevity:

"Yes, I am at 7th & H. I LOVE IT here in a place/area I never would have chosen myself!

"Typically, most people are either satisfied here, or they hate it! Lot of drama and issues in certain areas, but truly depends on the attitude of the individual. Many of those living here would have trouble getting in other places, so there is an element of things to deal with."

One of the two similar floorplans.
Click pic to enlarge.
From what I understand, at its best, a studio apartment that a formerly-homeless person or a pair of formerly-homeless people would live in at Mercy Housing is not dissimilar from a room at, say, an average West Sac motel. There is not a living room, but the complex has a lot of communal space that has seating for people to enjoy each others’ company.

A problem for many at Mercy Housing is likely to be an absence of sustained peace and quiet. The idea of a home being one’s castle persists. The idea of a castle having a moat around it to keep others out, exists. 

Another "problem" with the 7th & H building is its ground floor. Businesses haven't wanted to locate on the ground floor for the rather-obvious reason that it's substandard housing, located across from the downtown jail. Thus the ground floor is vacant, or nearly so most of the time, with what one or two businesses are there, briefly, having very few customers.

This is something that should have been anticipated. As it is, it is a very costly mistake, resulting in there being fewer apartments than there could have been. Though, certainly, having ground-floor apartments in a downtown building would be problematic.


Popular posts from this blog

The Mission Five Years Ago, And Today

I have spent the night the past two weeks plus at the Union Gospel Mission and am having an excellent time of it -- not only regards to sleeping in the dorm that the mission has, but also listening to the sermons that are delivered in the early evening. The Christmas music that is performed is also splendid. [And the food -- the FOOD -- has been fantastic during my stay so far! A happier Tom there couldn't be.] I chatted with a pal last night about The Mish – about how things were about five years ago when we both used the mission’s services frequently, and how thing are, today.
Five years ago, there were a lot scuffles between the guys when the front gate was opened in the early afternoon and in the area near the contact window there were some brawls as guys fought over where guys were in line to get a bed in the dorm.
Nowadays, however, the mission is very much a peaceful place both on the grounds of the facility and and out on the street.
I do not know what transformative eve…

Homeless Sacramentans lose case that would have given them the right to set up outdoor camping

8/11/13 I certainly give attorneys Mark Merin and Cat Williams credit for pursuing a case against the city of Sacramento to give homeless Sacramentans the right to set up tents and a campsite. I wanted them to win their case, but they didn't. They lost it.

BUT, it is also necessary to look at the particulars of the case that Merin and Williams brought and see that the situation underlying the court case was not very compelling.

During the period eight years ago when 22 homeless campers set up their tents and brought in supplies to Mark Merin's vacant lot at C Street, near 12th, there was loud noise and plenty of other mayhem. Drug dealers were on the street encouraging buys from the campers. The Hernandez couple that lived in a house nearby were constantly being taunted by the campers, disrupting their lives.

Per always with Safe Ground camps, calm was deserted for the sake of boisterousness.

Leader John Kraintz and the other Safe Grounders would claim to have signed strict a…

New Triage Shelter [on Railway Rd.] moves toward completion

I received a generous response from Leo McFarland of VOA on the status of the 200-bed Triage Shelter that is progressing toward completion on Railway Rd.

McFarland writes,
Tom, all the contacts and referrals to the Triage Shelter are coming from the outreach team called the Impact Team.  No walk ups are allowed per our contract with the City. Last night's opening was scheduled to be limited to 50 individuals for several reasons. First the Impact team transports each referral over to the Shelter which limits the number that could be handled by this group on opening day.

Secondly, and more to the site permit challenge, we have not completed the full interior build out as yet. We are going to erect physical walls in the Shelter to provide for guests' privacy in the sleeping areas.

Everything is complete for this build except we cannot begin to set it up until the city issues us the building permit.  It is under review by the city and we expect to get the green light v…