Skip to main content

Right2Rest. Right2Eat. No one is expected to do the impossible.

From a case in Italy, the story of "Les Miserables" may be on its way to being rewritten.

The New York Times tells us today that a Ukraine man, Roman Ostriakov, was caught trying to take cheese and sausage from a supermarket in Genoa, Italy. The value of the food was approximately $4.70 in US Dollars.

At trial, Mr. Ostriakov was sentenced to six months in jail and a fine of 100 Euros, which in American dollars is about $115.48

The case was appealed and the higher court determined that "the condition of the defendant and the circumstances in which the merchandise theft took place prove that [Mr. Ostriakov] took possession of the small amount of food in the face of the immediate and essential need for nourishment, acting therefore in a state of need." Thus, concluded the court, "the theft does not constitute a crime."

A document providing a full statement of the court's reasoning has not been put forward as yet, but an Italian legal doctrine was cited. The doctrine, in Latin, reads "Ad impossibilia nemo tenetur." An English translation is "No one is expected to do the impossible."

The decision is getting a great deal of attention in Italy.

A newpaper editor in Turin, Massimo Gramellini, complained, bitterly, that "In America [the court decision] would be blasphemy. And here as well, some conformists will talk about a legitimization of proletarian expropriation."

A Mr. Colombo, a former member of the Supreme Court of Cassation, said he believed that the decision in the Ostriakov case was correct: "Under the Italian Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, everyone  has a legal right to dignity.

"If you can't eat because you have absolutely no money, and cannot sustain yourself without taking something you don't own, in this case, the Italian criminal law justifies this theft."

Now how is it, a homeless Sacramentan might wonder, that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that Mr. Colombo mentions isn't enforced in Sacramento? Everyone has a legal right to dignity? In Sacramento!? Bullshit.


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…