Skip to main content

Fareed Zakaria Lauds "Housing First"

May 1, 2016 

 A segment -- "What in the World?" -- in the middle of the CNN Sunday morning news show "Fareed Zakaria GPS" was a vigorous endorsement of Housing First by the program's host.
Fareed Zakaria
Despite a healthy economy overall, many American cities are seeing a disturbing rise in homelessness. In New York [City], the number of homeless people sleeping in city shelters has shot up 92% in the last decade. Homelessness has reached its highest level since the Great Depression in the Big Apple, according to the Coalition for the Homeless.

Seattle, Portland and the entire state of Hawaii declared a State of Emergency last year because their unsheltered populations are so high. Los Angeles has considered the same measure.

But there is some good news.

A bipartisan consensus has landed on a solution for this problem: to simply give homeless people homes with few or no strings attached.

You see, if you can get someone off the streets immediately, the idea goes, it becomes easier to address the problems that made someone homeless in the first place: Drug addiction, mental illness, unemployment.

Sound crazy? Consider the experience of Utah. This reddest of red states was the first place to adopt the so-called Housing First approach statewide in 2005, according to the National Alliance to End Homelessness.

The effort was led by a conservative who had worked for the Mormon church, Lloyd Pendleton, [who is] no friend of free government handouts.

Utah's chronically homeless -- the most serious long-term cases -- were given homes, but were also held accountable, overseen by caseworkers and required to pay part of their rent, Pendleton told us.

After a successful small-scale pilot program, the state pledged to effectively end chronic homelessness by 2015. Utah nearly met that goal, housing 91% of the chronically homeless since 2005, the state says.

Part of that dramatic decline was due to changes in how the homeless were counted, Pendleton says, but the state's efforts were still impressive.

What's more, Utah's Housing First approach actually saved taxpayers money, according to Pendleton.

The old way of addressing homelessness, providing only temporary shelter for those living on the street, leads to more instability for the homeless, more trips to the emergency rooms and to jails. But giving the homeless a more-permanent home helped break that cycle, saving between 25% to 40% per person per year, Pendleton estimates.

Studies of similar efforts elsewhere also show big savings. It's no wonder that many other conservatives have supported this policy -- including, most prominently, the George W. Bush Administration which encouraged other places to adopt it. 

Nationwide, permanent supportive housing units have grown 69% since 2007, according to the National Alliance to End Homelessness.

And, since 2010, homelessness has dropped by nearly 12%, a decrease The Alliance credits in part to the Housing First approach.

There's still much work to do. Nearly one-third of today's homeless don't even have access to a shelter at night. Combating homelessness in Salt Lake City is different from fighting it elsewhere. But if we're willing to be innovative, embrace solutions that work, these are problems that can be solved in the world's richest country.
 ---------
The words, above, from Zakaria were transcribed from the Podcast of the May 1, 2016 episode of  "Fareed Zakaria GPS (Episode 91)."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
"
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/marcos-breton/#storylink= It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "Cécile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…