Skip to main content

Pope Francis, problems of the poor, and the distribution of wealth

I snagged this quote from a Facebook post by a rabid Bernie Sanders-supporter friend of mine.

I think you can read what Pope Francis says here and interpret it in different ways.

One way, is to read what is said as a direct endorsement of Bernie Sanders' perceived political position that America should become a socialist democracy like Sweden or Denmark. [Since Sanders met with the pope a few days ago, this would make sense.]

But another way to read it is that Francis is just demanding that extreme inequality that exists in America and elsewhere must be addressed.

I think we can address the problems of profoundly unfair distribution of wealth without making America more socialist. We can make it illegal to "bribe" businesses -- including sports teams, like the Kings -- to make their headquarters in your city or town. Sports teams, and other businesses, should play/operate wherever they like, based on their analysis of where they would be most successful.

I don't think that anybody works so hard and is so damn brilliant that his/her labor is worth more than a million dollars per year. We have a minimum wage in this country to protect businesses from being abusive. We should, as well, have a maximum salary/wage, to protect against Boards of Directors of corporations lavishly enriching friends who are administrators from being absurdly way, way, way overcompensated for their work. 

We need to end the circumstance where banks and other finance-related businesses gamble with their money and create situations such as the mortgage crisis [i.e,, the Great Recession of 2008]. Banks must be restricted to activities that are the traditional province of banks.

People who make a lot of money from their work and from investments should be taxed appropriately. Over the history of our country, the tax rates have been raised for rich people such that the country could recover from the expense of the Revolutionary War; the Great Depression; and World Wars I and II.  A tax rate of something like 50% or 60% for income over a million dollars would be appropriate for the next decade or two. The USA has a huge National Debt that must be paid down. As well, something must be done to reduce the huge debts millennials (and others) have piled up getting a college or university education. Post high-school education shouldn't be free, but it should be much, much less expensive than it currently is.

Something must be done to fully prevent wealthy people from laundering their money outside the country to fully avoid taxes. This is a big, big issue, now, with the release of the Panama Papers.

As for lifting up the most impoverished, we can use some of the increased tax revenue from the wealthy to aid people. As well, we must increase the minimum wage such that it is enough to live on based on living expenses in the area where a person resides. In most places, a $15/hour (or more) minimum wage would be appropriate.

There's a lot else we can do similar to what I've described. We must get on with it. Congress, the states, the cities must get to work!
- - -
I am sure many people might complain that a salary/payment maximum of a mere one million dollars would be an arduous burden for celebrity actors and musicians who are accustomed to reaping tens of millions every year. There would be fear that these 'talented' people would leave the US to practice their art in the Europe or Tierra del Fuego or some other far-flung place. I say, "Let them leave." New artists would emerge in America in their wake! We don't really need George Clooney or Beyonce. Well. On second thought, we don't need Clooney, anyway.


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…