Skip to main content

Cleaning the mess after the homeless campers leave the American River Parkway

A Bee top-o-the-page Forum-section opinion piece, titled "Cleanup reveals chaos in imperiled parkway," by Erika D. Smith, finds the journalist aiding in the clean-up of the American River Parkway in the area where things were maximally disgusting, near Discovery Park.

Erika D. Smith's opinion piece about the great mess left
by homeless campers along the American River Parkway.
[Try not to notice my 
as a photographer. -- T.A.]
Most of what Smith writes about is the abhorrent conditions where homeless parkway campers lived with the stench of human waste, the evidence of continual drug use, and a considerable number of hypodermic needles thrown about. It's a colossal mess, without a doubt. As well, the beauty of the parkway has taken another devastating hit, further lengthening a timespan measured in many, many years (Perhaps, a decade?) for it to recover.

At its end, the parkway comes to be the whole of Ms. Smith's concern. In the middle of her piece, she quotes a long-time clean-up volunteer who says, "I used to worry about the people out here. Now, I worry more about the parkway."

Ms. Smith ends her opinion piece in what seems quiet, yet disgusted, resignation, thus:
More that any other, [a] camp, buried deep in the parkway where rangers don't often go, offered proof that people aren't just camping on the American River Parkway. Many of them don't have any intention of living anywhere else or changing the horrific way they treat the parkway. 
So, as a community, what do we do with this group of homeless people? Stopping the wildfires is one thing. That's easy. This is something else.
More cheery is another piece about homelessness in the Opinion section, titled "Don't give up on helping homeless." The Bee Editorial Board, in which Erika D. Smith is a member, writes hopefully about helping homeless people. It surveys the homeless circumstance all around the state and concludes thus:
Persistence is our best weapon in getting California's most vulnerable the help they need.
I wrote an email to Ms. Smith, encouraging her to write a follow-up to her Forum piece about the mess that, instead, explores how best to help the campers. The text of my email follows:

Ms. Smith, 
I read your piece in the Forum section. Certainly, the American River Parkway should be protected such to return it to its prior glory. Persons must be disallowed to set up a camp that is effectively a permanent place for themselves along the parkway or around Discovery Park. 
This isn't new news; this is old news, as Phil Serna knows firsthand. 
What is again unaddressed is your question -- and its variants in the past -- to the effect of what should happen to the campers who created the great mess, now? Or, as it is better phrased in Homeless World, Where is a place for these people to go? 
You seem to assume that these campers had good alternatives but resorted to messing up the Parkway, yet again. What were these alternatives? 
I am neither excusing nor dismissing the great messes or the aberrational lifestyle the campers led. But they are in a circumstance (at this moment) that is little different than what all homeless people encounter: Their life is slipping away and they need something to make the hurting stop. 
Actually, the way to a cure for these campers is known. It is precisely what you quote Ryan Loofbourrow dismissing. These substance-abusing ARP campers need "meaning in their life" and healthy human connections. Addiction, in fact, isn't King; never was. 
Ms. Smith, you should write a follow-up piece to your Forum piece, today. You should do that in part because yours is yet another in a long string of incomplete opinion pieces by the Bee Board and Breton on this general topic that is cut off at its end except for a self-satisfied snarl. You should get a phone and internet access and find out "what [we should] do with this group of homeless people," for yourself. You're a journalist, right? Hop to it! 
Tom Armstrong
Sacramento Homeless blog


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…