Skip to main content

More SNR madness

5/15/15 cover of SNR.
In this week’s weak SNR, the publisher goes to a “public square” meeting on homelessness and nothing interesting happens. Instead of writing about the issues, vonKaenel -- the arms-akimbo guy --writes about almost not getting in and eating a meal there that he was not entitled to.

There is hope though. A reader named Twit asks as a comment to the vonKaenel piece, "What questions should have been asked and answered?"

It's possible vonKaenel will respond to the reader's query, but, alternately, he might just tell us what he had for dinner and the color of his tie that night.

Per 90% of always, the Sacramento News and Review writes about homelessness without getting within fifty feet of homeless people.

Arms Akimbo Guy.
[Picture cleverly
altered to avoid me,
Tom, from getting
As I’ve mentioned multiple times before, and am motivated to do so again – even if I am at risk of writing something as boring as vonKaenel’s Greenlight column – homeless people are treated like black folk were in the 50’s by the white press. Way back then, THE black opinion on matters always came from what Ebony magazine called, mockingly, “the official negro spokesman” which was whomever was the most-prominent black person accessible to the all-white press at the time. Black opinion in the white press was presented as if black people were amorphous, all sharing that one opinion of the quotable white-journalists-chosen Top Black Guy.

Similarly, the press in Sac'to, today, writes about homeless folk by going to functions where big wheels in the homeless-aid industry gather and praise each other and present homeless folk as kindly retarded toddlers, for the always-on-their-mind purpose of wooing donors.

Homeless people, today, in Sacramento are absent as sources in what the Bee and SNR print when writing about homeless people, which explains why their stories are about as fact-based as Seymour Hersh’s latest investigative piece.

BTW, I'm NOT talking about ME -- prominent, beloved homelessness blogger -- as a source for SNR to use. There are many, many great, trustworthy, know-the-street guys and gals who populate Homeless World who can provide the bare-skinny on all matters, homeless. Me, I'm off on the sidelines these days, out of the kink and thrust of it all.

Woe, Jeff vonKaenel. You are such a horse’s pitoot.

I think it was a good move by SNR editor Nick Miller to have NOT listed Greenlight in the hardcopy version of the issue’s content listing this week. That can have saved some readers from seeing the column and nodding off.

Something that is likely not to have caused readers to nod off was Miller’s unique Editor’s Note this week, regaling the latest Seymour Hersh investigative journalism piece, without addressing important facts, just riffing with whatever floats out of his head.

From what I know: Hersh was unable to find a publisher in the United States for his investigate piece and it was thus remaindered – whoops, I mean published -- in the London Review of Books, a wholly inappropriate place for it, of course, whether the article was any good or not. Hersh’s article claims that the story from the White House about how Osama bin Laden was found and killed was a complete hoax.

The reason that Hersh could not find a publisher for his article in the US was because newspaper editors-in-chief throughout the country did not find that Hersh had amassed sufficient evidence that the official story was not true and that Hersh’s alternate storyline, taken from unnamed sources, was factual.

Apparently, based on Miller’s praise for Hersh in his column this week, Miller would have printed the Hersh piece without reading it. Way to go, Miller. You are such a J-school star.

Yes, the Columbia Journalism Review decries what it perceives to be a failure of US journalists to attempt to validate Hersh’s claims, but the widespread reputation of Hersh as a crank, desperate for a return to glory, is well-established over a period of decades. Listening to the most-recent Slate Gabfest -- The "I Don't Mean to Yell at You but I Feel Good Doing It" edition -- it seems that Hersh had become an angry, unreasonable old man who’s lost touch and has fully broken bridges of trust with elite journalists and prominent editors through-out America. [With Miller -- who's neither elite nor prominent -- being a sort-of exception, here.]

C'mon, SNR! The Bee is imploding. Now is the time for you to GET SERIOUS and GROW UP. Don't any of you want to be journalists before you wither & die?

The infamous Xmas issue.
I had written Miller and Arms Akimbo a couple weeks ago suggesting they do something noble and needed: Apologize to Sheriff Jones for what SNR wrote about him in their Christmas issue. But that won't happen, of course. SNR doesn't admit errors, thus there is no correction of misstatements or noting of ethical lapses nor even an apology for Hosseini's thoroughly incompetent attempt at poetry. STOP STINKING SO BAD, SNR. Pull your selves together.

And, by the way, SNR also owes an apology to the Union Gospel Mission for their Stephen Glass penned piece that was wholly an act of bogus reporting. UGM doesn't want any apology, but I do. To set the record straight. The truth matters.


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "Cécile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…