Skip to main content

Aid to homeless people has diminished, while poor, less-desperate people receive more aid

Government assistance to people with incomes that are one-half to two-times the poverty level has increased since 1983. But to those with incomes less than that, it has actually decreased.
– text from a New York Times graph titled “At the Bottom and Left Behind.”

A top-center of the front page article in the New York Times today tells of the incomprehensible actions of government in giving more aid to struggling low-wage workers and certain categories of poor folk seen as “deserving” of help, while the most-desperate poor folk -- most homeless individuals – are getting an ever-shrinking amount of aid.

Article at the top, front & center in the NYT.
The title of the article is “Aid to Needy Often Excludes Poorest in U.S.

Robert A. Moffitt, an economist at Johns Hopkins University, is the source of the information in the article. What the Times printed is from a piece Moffitt wrote for the journal Demography that is soon to be published.

Dr. Moffitt is a Senior Fellow and former Director at the Center for Health Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation.

At the Heritage website, Moffitt is identified as being conservative politically which makes the thrust of his findings both particularly believable and disheartening.  I say/write that because the thrust of Moffitt’s analysis cannot be dismissed as poor-people-loving liberal claptrap, and, thus, more-easily ignored by the breadth of politicians and others who might be able to address the absurdity of not providing the most help to the most needy.

Here is some pivotal text from the piece, written by Times reporter Patricia Cohen:
Dr. Moffitt found that government assistance for families whose incomes flutter just above the poverty line nearly doubled from 1983 to 2004) after taking inflation into account. The numbers look very different for those scraping along at the bottom, generally unemployed single mothers with children. Their benefits declined in real terms by about one-third.

During the Great Recession, assistance to the poorest briefly expanded but has since fallen back, he said, and there is no indication that the long-run trend is shifting.
All this is appalling news on the face of it, but near gruesome in the face of deteriorating conditions "on the street" for suffering homeless people in Sacramento.

Sleeping somewhere when the shelters are full is currently illegal, and if a lawsuit that Attorney Mark Merin is pursuing fails to provide some shred of legal protection for those who find a space -- any space -- to put a blanket, sleeping bag or tent, then we, as a society, are fully in an Orwellian nightmare. The police will be emboldened, perhaps such to, effectively, chase homeless people out of the county.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
"
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/marcos-breton/#storylink= It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…