Skip to main content

SN&R's report card on homelessness that doesn't say anything

SNR cover for 7/25/13
This week the Sacramento News & Review’s cover story is a Report Card on the City. Homelessness is one of the 22 subjects. Sadly, the Report report is mostly a smirk & jive thing, showing off how snarky & clever-seeming the publication’s staff can be. There are ten names in the byline for the article-by-committee.

SN&R is a conventional tabloid-size alternative weekly, which ain’t bad: Clever as all-get-out much of the time but often not as venturesome as it pretends to be. It’s great at word gymnastics, but too often shy about getting on the phone and out into the field to learn something new such to do good old-fashioned wear-out-the-shoe-leather seek-the-TRUTH substantive reporting.

With clear exceptions, Cosmo's Bites column most notably, SN&R doesn’t want to deal with surprises. It doesn’t want to stir things up, or lose its moderate mooring.  It just wants to pretend to stir things up such that readers can hold the publication in their hands at a coffee shop [A conventional coffee shop; a Starbucks] and impress others that they have liberal mojo.

Likely, I'm being too harsh. The publication is targeted at people half my age with income I don't have offering articles about restaurants and beer and movies and such to guide them about how to have a satisfying nightlife. Politics is the hors d'oeuvre to make SN&R appear smart; lifestyle is what fattens it with pages and lures in the audience it needs for advertisers.

Full text of SNR report on homelessness
On to Homelessness.  SN&R's grade and spiel on homelessness -- at right -- doesn't make a lick of sense. Why is it titled "Rooftops?" Forget what grade the subject is given, what does the grade measure? What does it mean? What might an 'A' grade or 'F' grade indicate?  In the immortal [albeit mostly forgotten] words of Mondale to Dukakis, "Where's the beef?"

To grade something there has to be some concept of what the standards are. Sometimes, those standards are obvious. But for HOMELESSNESS, as a subject, it is not so obvious.

You could grade based on how much less misery the homeless are having to experience.  Or, the abundance of opportunities there are for homeless folk to carve out a better life for themselves.  Or -- from a conventional housed citizen's perspective -- how many fewer of the rascals are out on the street.

My guess is that SN&R is looking just at how much bother there all is, from a host of perspectives.  I don't see how that gets us anywhere, or guides us on what direction to take to make things better.  Nor does it tell us what "better" might mean, other than less bother -- which would mean moving things in the direction of making the homeless less visible.  For homeless folk, though, less visible equates to more misery.

We could grade homelessness on what's now popular nationally: based on how many homeless folk are getting SSI benefits, for either real or concocted disabilities, such that we can live in postage-stamp apartments that become poverty traps. Most homeless Sacramentans would go for that; but it entails giving up that Declaration of Independence "pursuit of happiness" thing and thinking that life can have meaning and purpose and that empathizing with others is worthwhile and being productive and of benefit to the wider society is good.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
"
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/marcos-breton/#storylink= It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "Cécile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…