Skip to main content

SN&R's report card on homelessness that doesn't say anything

SNR cover for 7/25/13
This week the Sacramento News & Review’s cover story is a Report Card on the City. Homelessness is one of the 22 subjects. Sadly, the Report report is mostly a smirk & jive thing, showing off how snarky & clever-seeming the publication’s staff can be. There are ten names in the byline for the article-by-committee.

SN&R is a conventional tabloid-size alternative weekly, which ain’t bad: Clever as all-get-out much of the time but often not as venturesome as it pretends to be. It’s great at word gymnastics, but too often shy about getting on the phone and out into the field to learn something new such to do good old-fashioned wear-out-the-shoe-leather seek-the-TRUTH substantive reporting.

With clear exceptions, Cosmo's Bites column most notably, SN&R doesn’t want to deal with surprises. It doesn’t want to stir things up, or lose its moderate mooring.  It just wants to pretend to stir things up such that readers can hold the publication in their hands at a coffee shop [A conventional coffee shop; a Starbucks] and impress others that they have liberal mojo.

Likely, I'm being too harsh. The publication is targeted at people half my age with income I don't have offering articles about restaurants and beer and movies and such to guide them about how to have a satisfying nightlife. Politics is the hors d'oeuvre to make SN&R appear smart; lifestyle is what fattens it with pages and lures in the audience it needs for advertisers.

Full text of SNR report on homelessness
On to Homelessness.  SN&R's grade and spiel on homelessness -- at right -- doesn't make a lick of sense. Why is it titled "Rooftops?" Forget what grade the subject is given, what does the grade measure? What does it mean? What might an 'A' grade or 'F' grade indicate?  In the immortal [albeit mostly forgotten] words of Mondale to Dukakis, "Where's the beef?"

To grade something there has to be some concept of what the standards are. Sometimes, those standards are obvious. But for HOMELESSNESS, as a subject, it is not so obvious.

You could grade based on how much less misery the homeless are having to experience.  Or, the abundance of opportunities there are for homeless folk to carve out a better life for themselves.  Or -- from a conventional housed citizen's perspective -- how many fewer of the rascals are out on the street.

My guess is that SN&R is looking just at how much bother there all is, from a host of perspectives.  I don't see how that gets us anywhere, or guides us on what direction to take to make things better.  Nor does it tell us what "better" might mean, other than less bother -- which would mean moving things in the direction of making the homeless less visible.  For homeless folk, though, less visible equates to more misery.

We could grade homelessness on what's now popular nationally: based on how many homeless folk are getting SSI benefits, for either real or concocted disabilities, such that we can live in postage-stamp apartments that become poverty traps. Most homeless Sacramentans would go for that; but it entails giving up that Declaration of Independence "pursuit of happiness" thing and thinking that life can have meaning and purpose and that empathizing with others is worthwhile and being productive and of benefit to the wider society is good.


Popular posts from this blog

The Mission Five Years Ago, And Today

I have spent the night the past two weeks plus at the Union Gospel Mission and am having an excellent time of it -- not only regards to sleeping in the dorm that the mission has, but also listening to the sermons that are delivered in the early evening. The Christmas music that is performed is also splendid. [And the food -- the FOOD -- has been fantastic during my stay so far! A happier Tom there couldn't be.] I chatted with a pal last night about The Mish – about how things were about five years ago when we both used the mission’s services frequently, and how thing are, today.
Five years ago, there were a lot scuffles between the guys when the front gate was opened in the early afternoon and in the area near the contact window there were some brawls as guys fought over where guys were in line to get a bed in the dorm.
Nowadays, however, the mission is very much a peaceful place both on the grounds of the facility and and out on the street.
I do not know what transformative eve…

Homeless Sacramentans lose case that would have given them the right to set up outdoor camping

8/11/13 I certainly give attorneys Mark Merin and Cat Williams credit for pursuing a case against the city of Sacramento to give homeless Sacramentans the right to set up tents and a campsite. I wanted them to win their case, but they didn't. They lost it.

BUT, it is also necessary to look at the particulars of the case that Merin and Williams brought and see that the situation underlying the court case was not very compelling.

During the period eight years ago when 22 homeless campers set up their tents and brought in supplies to Mark Merin's vacant lot at C Street, near 12th, there was loud noise and plenty of other mayhem. Drug dealers were on the street encouraging buys from the campers. The Hernandez couple that lived in a house nearby were constantly being taunted by the campers, disrupting their lives.

Per always with Safe Ground camps, calm was deserted for the sake of boisterousness.

Leader John Kraintz and the other Safe Grounders would claim to have signed strict a…

After a Three-Month Hiatus, a Fall from a Ladder & a Broken Wrist, Evangelist Jimmy Roughton Returns to Union Gospel Mission to Preach

After being away from Union Gospel Mission for a quarter of a year, Jimmy Roughton returned to preach at UGM on the cold night of December 13 -- despite suffering [a little? a lot? dunno.] from a fall from a ladder that likely immediately preceded a significant injury (a wrist that was broken).

It was good to see his group from Capital Free Will Baptist Church up on the pulpit, with Roughton rough-and-ready to seduce and inspire the happily-captivate crowd at UGM.

Roughton told us in his opening words that he was now in his 27th year coming to the mission.

I recall the first preaching I had heard from Roughton on June 13, 2009. At that time and up to the current time, Roughton is the only preacher I had ever heard evoke Pascal's Wager -- which is something he would do, occasionally thereafter at the mission. He would evoke Pascal's wager, yet again, last night [12/13/17].

Pascal's wager

Last night, Jimmy evoked Pascal's Wager. He did so near the end of his talk, citing …