Skip to main content

Response to Ginger Rutland

Below, is an “Another View” editorial submission to the Sacramento Bee I wrote in response to a dunderheaded editorial written by associate editor Ginger Rutland.  Rutland appears to have as an assignment the writing of Bee eds regarding homeless issues despite the fact that she continually demonstrates that she knows nothing about homeless people and the homeless circumstance in Sacramento and is unwilling to learn anything.  An editorial Rutland wrote last year [to which I submitted an unpublished response] was the biggest heap of twaddle I have ever read – outside of Loaves & Fishes newsletters.

----

In her editorial in the July 5 edition of the Bee, “Time to plant some cactus at City Hall?” staffer Ginger Rutland, a bit-past-middle-age black woman, finds the remnants of the Occupy Sacramento protest movement alive and well on the square-block property where the two Sacramento City Hall buildings (Old and New) are locked in tender embrace.

She identifies two of the protesters there who cite, fully plausibly, their ongoing link to the protest movement. They seem to be solid citizens – though one, Rutland tells us, has grimy toes. Rutland doesn’t deny that they are engaged in free speech [“This isn’t about free speech,” she writes.], instead she tells us her gripe is all about their camping there and the mess that creates.

Rutland makes several good suggestions to fix the problem. Primary is this: “Capital Park hosts large protests almost weekly,” she tells us, “… protesters there must get permits. They can’t monopolize the space indefinitely, as is happening at City Hall.” Bravo, I say. An accommodation that retains American freedom in all its banner-flapping pride and glory can be had. WTG, Ginger! Let us have the law at Capital Park be the same at City Hall’s one block of soil. Hooray!

But then, suddenly, in the wrap, Rutland rages around uncontrollably, thumping (with no connection to what went before) Sacramento’s homeless community for our supposed miscreant deeds. To underscore the prejudice, here is Rutland’s next-to-last paragraph with the word “black” substituted where she used “homeless”:
“I have long thought that elected officials across the region ought to create black campgrounds – spaces where black people could legally be. But the front lawn at City Hall is not a space anyone would recommend. No private business wants black people camping at its front door. City Hall is where the people's business is conducted. The people of Sacramento deserve better.”
Ms. Rutland: You need to get out more and actually meet a variety of homeless people. Indeed, many are rascals, but most are quite nice and have wonderful qualities, talents, and dispositions. A lot of us know a lot about the Occupy movement and supported it up until it failed to have a Second Act. If you knew us, I am confident you wouldn’t disparage us so. You would understand about our suffering and the search many of us are embarked on to find meaning in our life.

[End of what I submitted]
---
It needs to be added, that if the fierce prejudice in the Bee's awful editorials about the homeless is to be rectified, it is not just Rutland, but the whole of the Bee editorial board that needs to be jettisoned. In her last paragraph, Rutland tells us of her editorial-board colleagues' joke, told "only partly in jest": "Take up the lawn in front of City Hall entirely. Replace it with a cactus garden. That way, the city could discourage campers, preserve water and rescue a once-serene public place all at the same time."

Ms Rutland, the board you're on is a disgrace, but you are the worst of it, so fully detached from the misery in recent history endured by people of your race that you can laugh at and repeat a joke that proposes to heap more suffering on those who are already suffering. I point out to you, too, that the homeless population is greatly disproportionate to the general population in being black.  The reason for that is largely (if not entirely) due to racism.  Ms. Rutland:  WAKE UP!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
"
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/marcos-breton/#storylink= It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

Allen Warren, hero of the homeless. Jeff Harris, misanthrope.

Councilman Allen Warren did something controversial -- that should never be controversial -- at Tuesday's Sacramento City Council meeting. He proposed that there should be a moratorium in some places in the city, allowing homeless folk to camp. This, according to an excellent piece in today's [1/12/17] Bee -- titled "Warren seeks temporary OK for camping in the city" -- written by the always-splendid reporter-extraordinaire Ryan Lillis.

What a wild idea! Instead of having things as they now are, which effectively disallows homeless people to exist, Warren would like for some places to be designated that would allow camping.

Councilman Jeff Harris, in sharp contrast to Warren, said at the meeting, that he "would never support losing our camping ordinance."

Quoting the article ...
"I'm not sure (Warren) has analyzed the situation thoroughly," Harris said. "I have to say I feel the camping ordinance is a management tool. It gives the police…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…