Skip to main content

Expect a bad aroma: Loaves & Fishes to close its Men’s Wash House for five days straight

The stench of bad leadership at Loaves & Fishes hangs in the air like a rotting halibut.
Men's Wash House: A vital service to allow homeless men to  keep  themselves clean with a shower, shave and clothing exchange.
Loaves & Fishes will be closing its Men’s Wash House for five days – the first five days of September – for reasons that have not been disclosed. A notice was put up in Friendship Park and at the wash house to that effect this morning.

A five-day period, during a hot summer, when homeless men cannot easily keep themselves clean is a significant disruption of homeless services. Being stinky out in public is a bummer. Loaves & Fishes really ought to find some empathy for the suffering of homeless folk. Or, ought to fire some of its reeking top-level employees and replace them with people who have a compassionate nature. In the past, the Wash House has been closed such that Wash House staff could take a single day off to go to a Star Trek Convention in Sacramento. A search of the Internet shows no evidence of a five-day, Memorial extended-weekend Star Trek Lollapalooza, though that could just be because it’s hidden behind a futuristic cloaking devise of some weird sort.

Anyway, the Wash House staff would never advocate for a long close; they care about their work and the guys they serve. Another possibility is that the water tank has busted, the building has been invaded by termites, and all the urinals and toilets have been busted up by gangsters dressed as nuns wielding bats – but still, it takes FIVE DAYS to fix merely all that? Or, it may be that Mark – the irreplaceable fully-competent-and-compassionate manager and Wash House Mr. Congeniality – is vacationing in Argentina. But, truly, there is no excuse. A five-day closure is unjustifiable, but IS the usual output from the never-stinting-at-being-meanspirited, disconnected-from-what-being-homeless-is-like Loaves & Fishes high-up management.

During the first three days of the Wash House closure, homeless men in the know will be able to go to the Union Gospel Mission for clean clothes and a shower. However, UGM does not have open hours, staff and facilities to compensate for the inavailability of the Wash House.


ckrd23315 said…
Seriously Tom? Loaves & Fishes receives no government funding and operates on private donations provided for the benefit of the area's homeless. More than 1000 people donate their time every month (volunteer = free labor = donating their time) to support the homeless through Loaves & Fishes. I'm wondering why your blog post isn't praising the services they provide. What if they just shut-down entirely? Would that be a better outcome for you?
Tom Armstrong said…
You bring up a lot of issues [some of them, perhaps, unintentionally on your part], but let me get to the last of what you said first:

Q. "What if [Loaves & Fishes] just shut down entirely?"
A. For starters, that wouldn't happen. A meteor isn't going to wipe out the Loaves & Fishes Mall. But, if everything did come to a sudden halt THAT WOULD FREE UP FOUR MILLION DOLLARS PER YEAR TO BE USED EFFICIENTLY FOR THE BENEFIT OF AREA HOMELESS PEOPLE. And volunteers could be freed-up to do something more meaningful and contributory. By the way, it is a ridiculous circumstance that all these volunteers come to a place where so very many people NEED EMPLOYMENT.

Q. You write "Loaves & Fishes receives no government funding."

A. Loaves & Fishes has a complex of buildings that pay no property tax. In this way Loaves & Fishes very directly gets government support that is no different from government funding. [It is similar to corporate-jet builders getting a reprieve from paying taxes.] For my part I very much wish Loaves & Fishes did get other government funding and with it a mandated obligation to serve nutritious meals; to properly abide by safety regulations [where else in Sacramento could a completely dead three-ton tree fall and almost kill a half-dozen people other than in L&F's Friendship Park?]; and cleanliness rules [On weekends in the past, and probably now, there is no place for homeless people to wash their hands before a weekend meal.]

Loaves & Fishes is a disgrace. What is amazing is that so little gets accomplished with so much money. But there is an explanation of that: The Administration at Loaves & Fishes is breathtakingly incompetent. North Korea has more-compassionate leadership.
ckrd23315 said…
I'm curious what makes you think that the 4 million dollars freed up would go to help the homeless if Loaves & Fishes closed their doors. That 4 million dollars is only allocated to fight homelessness because L&F is out there advocating for it. That 4 million (or at least part of it) could easily go elsewhere.

It is not unusual for non-profit organizations to have tax exemptions. I'll grant you that if a for-profit business occupied those buildings they would generate tax revenue, but this is hardly the equivalent of "government funding." I guess you think the government could spend 4 million dollars more efficiently ... in California? I seriously doubt that!

Ultimately you and I are on the same side here. We want to see people being cared for efficiently, effectively, and with compassion. Your points have merit, but I wonder if attacking the hand that feeds the homeless is the right approach to helping the homeless. Can we at least acknowledge that they are filling an important need in the community, even if they're not fully living up to your expectations?
Tom Armstrong said…

Again, your supposition isn't realistic. Loaves & Fishes isn't going to *POOF* disappear, as much as that possibility is an intriguing one.

BUT, allow me to point out that San Antonio, a similar-sized metropolis to Sacramento -- but much poorer -- raised $100 million for its Haven for Hope. See So maybe it is the case that Loaves & Fishes is COSTING Sacramento $96 million rather than bringing a relatively-paltry $4 million to the aid of homeless folk.

In any case, management of Loaves & Fishes is a thorough disgrace.

ckrd, I have no great objection to L&F getting a tax benefit, what I object to is its self-righteous claim of getting no benefit.

Certainly, Loaves & Fishes IS feeding homeless people. But since so very very much more could be done if the organization was properly managed it is a sad, sad waste that truly results in lives not being salvaged.
tamee martini said…
i used to be homeless and camped out lots of places in sac.. the orchard... the river.. tent city.. ive reintergrated into life for the past two years and let me tell you tom.. if it wasnt for loaves and fishes i wouldve gone starving..LOTS of times..sister libby was always kind and compassionate to me and my husband. i think your giving l and f a bad rap.. who cares about the politics.. we are talking about people here... i thank God for l and f ... they were there when we needed them .. thru our addiction and even now we keep in touch with sister libby and the many friends we made on the river.. stop bein so mean tom.. lighten up ..K?
Tom Armstrong said…

I do understand that if Loaves & Fishes was suddenly fully absent, a lot of people would in a world of trouble.

But is THAT the criteria that should be used? Comparing Loaves & Fishes to having nothing?

I know men who have been barred for life from L&F whose conduct at the mission was no different. But at the mission, they are motivated to save people rather than control them.

Yes, of course, Libby ACTS compassionately. But that is just one of her performances; she is in shape-shifting performance for each of her varying audiences. [See "Libby Fernandez: NOT a friend of the homeless."

As for the politics, the weird commutarian/ Dorothy Day / Catholic Workers Uhion politics of Loaves & Fishes alienates conservative involvement in understanding and helping the homeless through secular means. In San Antonio, Texas, the WHOLE of the metropolis is united and is much more responsive to homeless needs. THEIR example is -- in many ways, at least -- what should be followed. [btw, I am decidedly NOT conservative; I'm a traditional liberal.]

I do understand your gratitude toward L&F, but, truly, other people have suffered mightily directly because of Loaves & Fishes. Sacramento could be doing better than having L&F at the center of its homeless-help effort. Indeed, it is incredible bad luck that Loaves & Fishes exists. If the Delanys hadn't come along, a much better homeless-help charity would have come along in the 80s.

Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "Cécile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…