Skip to main content

Using insanity as a way out of the insanity

There's an interesting article by SlumJack, posted to the homeless section of, titled "How Homelessness Causes Psychiatric Disorders."

The main character, Alex, undergoing "aversion therapy" in the movie version of A Clockwork Orange.
I buy in to the thrust of what SlumJack writes in his piece, without being too sure of some of his details.

The gist of the argument is this, in my dandified words [Excuse me, SlumJack, if I am broadening your argument a tad.]:

If you are a longterm sane and sober chronically homeless person, you are stuck waist-deep in the big Muddy Muddy.  Unless you make a claim of being bonkers, and get certified as such (which isn't difficult to accomplish what with the too-eager and -friendly "doctors" out there), you'll never get out of the homeless-help services' Cesspool of Hopelessness that they (and society, with it's disinterest in your circumstance) has put you in and left you in.

But there is a steep price to becoming a certified-insane sane person:  You'll get treatment, most of which is on the order of what the character Alex was put through in Clockwork Orange.  That is, your brain'll get mucked with, and you will, just generally, move from one Cesspool of Hopelessness to a different, adjacent one.

SlumJack ends his essay with this wisdom: 
…being homeless is such a hard way to live, being such a day-to-day, hand-to-mouth, relentlessly difficult existence that one can come around to, well, adjusting his priorities. As O. said to me: "I'm not getting any younger and this ain't getting any easier."

This process has been going on a long time, too. While some people on the streets are indisputably sick, I can't help wondering what this farce might mean in terms of the much-publicized rates of mental illness in homeless people.


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…