Skip to main content

Sacramento homeless and the risks of Day Labor, Part I

The entrance to Loaves & Fishes' Friendship Park as seen from the north side of the North C St. cul-de-sac that abutts 12th Street.
As I’ve written frequently previously, contrary to the stereotype, a great great many homeless people are scrappy. They are not work avoidant; they are work (and pay!) accepting and seeking.

This optimism that ‘something can be made to happen,’ to break the waves of despondency, is what is most admirable (and constantly refreshing!) about those struggling in Homeless World Sacramento. It’s sparkling hope in a tightly bounded universe that too much tries to crush hope.

The lure of ‘escape’ from the circumstance of homelessness, for this very big subset of Sacramento homeless people, is to find meaning and happiness that isn’t available ‘out here.’1 The effort to find a more-normal life begins by sparking opportunities to make things different than just spinning around the turnstile of always just subsisting (and for many, doing the usual drinking or drugs) in Homeless World.

Thus, the energy and optimism that comes from seeking and offering themselves for work (or whatever involves engaging oneself in a productive task, though, for those of us with no retirement or disability income, getting PAID to do something is best. That is, we need some money.) is a break in the waves.

For a long time, you could see, from the Downtown-bound Blue Line [coming from Watt-I80] of the Light Rail, a sign over the entrance of Friendship Park, advertising Day Labor at Loaves & Fishes. The program, called “Daily Bread,” still up at the L&F website -- on this webpage,, it reads “Daily Bread Day Labor: A day labor referral service. Participants work in a wide range of jobs including yard work, construction, and moving. (916-832-5510)” -- was one way many homeless guys got temporary jobs.

The sign is down that was over Friendship Park. I’ve been told that a circumstance developed such that the Powers That Be at Loaves & Fishes got skittish about their legal liability [something I’ll get to in Part II of this series], such that the sign was pulled down, but the program was not entirely ended.

But there are risks (in addition to opportunities) to be found for homeless people jonesing for quick work and pay. While people from the general public are out there to help the homeless by using homeless labor in a mutually beneficial way, others prey on the homeless. And no one intercedes when bad things happen to good (homeless) people.

Forgive those who trespass against us

The way that that Daily Bread worked in Friendship Park, when it was fully active up until about six months ago, was this: At about 7:30am, homeless guys [and a rare gal] would begin lining up at a chosen spot, not far from the Information kiosk. A Green Hat [that is, a Park employee] would have the guys in the line draw a number out of a hat, which would, supposedly, determine the order that the guys would be chosen for any job-calls that came in. [So far as I can determine from all the fellows I’ve spoken to about this, all the jobs we are talking about here are under-the-table, and often, if not usually, pay less than minimum wage. Rare fully-legitimate jobs for homeless people, with Foodlink being the prominent employment example, went through other Loaves & Fishes’ sources, outside Daily Bread, to get homeless employees.]

When job calls came in, the caller would sometimes request certain homeless people [good workers he knew, e.g.] for the job task he had. Oftentimes, a requested person would not be someone on the ‘list’ that was created, nonetheless, the Green Hat would try to find [usually using the Park intercom] the requested homeless person if he was in the Park, somewhere.

Other times, it was widely believed, if a good job was called in to Park personnel, a Green Hat who was most centrally involved with Daily Bread Day Labor would funnel the job to homeless people he was friendly with. Indeed, it is widely believed that the number-draw list was pretty much always disregarded when good jobs (that paid well or were easy) came in, which were funneled to one particular Green Hat’s pals. Let me be clear that I believe the process of giving homeless guys day-jobs was corrupted: Not only were the jobs known to be under-the-table and, many, paying less than minimum wage, instances where homeless people were cheated were not followed-up on and the system of fair opportunity to get a day job was a sham. Basically, Loaves & Fishes affixed its Imprimatur to Daily Bread and, in its usual fully-careless way, let things fester and stink.

Jobs that came in that came from callers who were known to have serious problems, or who weren’t going to pay much, or had jobs that involved particularly difficult physical work, were given to homeless men who didn’t have an “in” with the Green Hats.

Like a frog in water. Such are the daze or our lives.
In Part 2 of this series, I will write up what I’ve been told of one-day- and short-term- jobs homeless people got from Daily Bread; from citizens approaching homeless people, usually from their cars; and some other off-the-radar regular sources. Some of the jobs are great; others barbaric.

1 NOT that being homeless is constant anguish. It’s very much not, for most of us. It’s more of a slow death by nicks and a slow accumulation of shame, something one can get all-too-acclimated with, and then wake up one day and find that you’re withering away, past saving. It’s like the ‘frog in a beaker of water’ story: Put a frog in a pot of cold water, and slowly bring the water to a boil. The frog, though capable of hopping right out, is only slowly discomfited. It stays put and proceeds to boil to death.


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "Cécile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…