Skip to main content

The county and city mustn't shirk their responsiblities to homeless citizens

It is crucial that Sacramento County and the city of Sacramento not abandon their responsibility to look out for homeless people in our metropolis.

A Bee board editorial, "New partnership needed for homeless," published on Sept 15, has everything backwards. It is written in support of an effort, by the county and city, to create a “new countywide or regional joint powers authority/public-private partnership” to handle and coordinate the critical task of aiding homeless people and saving them from suffering and harm.

Such a concocted powerful agency will directly deny homeless people government oversight to protect their interests.

Such an agency, composed in significant part by executives from Christian nonprofits to beg for money and aid from Christian church groups, is an affront to what is a cornerstone of our republic: the separation of church and state. Homeless people are citizens and have a right to secular government oversight. An effort to create an authority as foreseen by the Bee board should be opposed on Constitutional grounds.

Besides: Christian-church people are not a backstop to fill in when a government group chooses to shirk one of its highest responsibilities to, instead, satisfy the wants of more-affluent citizens who have the ear of the politicos and contribute to their campaign warchests.

Christian churches, themselves, have been badly affected by the bad economy.  An article in the New York Times, today, titled "Congregations Reeling From Decline in Donations," tells us "across the congregational landscape of America. From storefront chapels to Sun Belt megachurches to suburban synagogues, across denominational lines, religious institutions are reeling from a decline in donations."  Surely, nowhere are matters worse than in our struggling county, that has particularly high unemployment and where state workers are being furloughed.

The state, the county and city have made wrong decisions that don't give the most import issues highest priority.  Helping the poor and homeless should be at or near the top of any priority list, not something that can be abandoned.

Many of the homeless-service nonprofits have expanded their empires in recent years while the regional governments and citizens have suffered in our bad economy. Some homeless-service nonprofits focus on themselves, exclusively, providing terrible, stinting service to homeless people.

Please. Let us not put the jackels in charge.  Let us maintain direct oversight from the county of homeless services it funds (and let us see services being funded!)  And let there be direct interest in homeless matters coming from the city, with funds forthcoming in difficult times.

[This is a slightly altered and augmented copy of a piece I submitted to the Bee a week ago that, by their non-response response, I have learned they chose not to publish as "Another View."]


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "Cécile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…