Skip to main content

Putting the profit motive and purpose motive together

Here, another video [based on the work/research of Dan Pink] that is in many ways contrary to the Slavoj Žižek video of the prior post. The economic insight, here, is to do exactly what Slavoj Žižek despises: Putting the profit motive and the purpose motive together in organizations.

But it's different, too, since Pink is looking at what goes on inside the organization, as opposed to Žižek who looked at consumer culture and greedheadedness of capitalism.

Pink uses a universe of research that shows that in cognitive tasks, 'pay' fails as a incentivizor to improve performance.  Instead, for people involved in 'thinking' jobs, being given autonomy, mastery and purpose are what's important to motivate better performance, so long as pay isn't unreasonably low.

This 'undermines' the central reason for the "success" of capitalism: that people are motivated by greed (or money, at least) and that we can "use" that to make society function. In not-unusual situations, people are not motivated by greed; instead, it's being loosed to do outstanding work and to think for oneself that brings employees joy.  It's meaning and happiness that tickle us into upsurges of high productivity on the job.

BUT, this also puts the kabosh on the idea, out in the left wing of the Sacramento homeless-help industy, that some oppressive form of socialism is the key to a better society.  A "command" government, that the wacky five nonprofits in Homeless World Sac want, would necessarily be totalitarian, and thus freedom killing.  Very few thinkers would have autonomy, mastery or purpose in their workday.  And, as has been shown by the failure of dozens of countries in the 20th Century, unhappy, unmotivated workers would be key reasons for the failure of the system.


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "Cécile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…