Skip to main content

Joan Burke evokes Rosa Parks at Aug 24 City Council session

Many homeless people and executives with homeless-services nonprofits came to the city council meeting, yesterday, to express their opinions regarding the Sacramento City Council’s determination, last week, to move the period when citizens make two-minute comments to the council from the beginning of the weekly sessions to the end of the sessions.

Sentiment by most yesterday in the public-speaking period, were intolerant of the decision to move ‘public comments’ and expressed no understanding of the logic in doing so.

Tamie Dramer, Executive Director of SafeGround Sacramento, called the action of moving the comment period one of “disenfranchisement” and accused the council of punishing the whole of the public in an act endeavoring “to sideline a group of already marginalized people.”

Joan Burke, homeless-services nonprofit Loaves & Fishes executive, said that the message of moving the speaking period is the “same, exact message when you told people you have to go to the back of the bus.”

Burke’s sentiment, evoking an iconic moment in the civil rights movement, would be hilarious if it wasn’t so insensitive and odd.

While I and the great majority of homeless people would appreciate more and urgent action from the city council at enacting laws, or waiving some laws, to make homelessness less of a miserable and dangerous condition, the spectre of homelessness in Sacramento is not the equivalent to the effort to address rights relating to racism in the 50s and 60s.

Furthermore, SafeGround has been heard by the city council, and will continue to be. The members of the organization are more resourceful and have greater access than they pretend. Indeed, they have easy access to the ear of the mayor and other council members. Their persistent complaining is what is damnable, since it is harmful to the ends they claim to want to achieve. SafeGround’s effort to filibuster and annoy is childish. The group, in particular those who are, themselves, homeless, fail to even attempt to consider the needs of others that would make achievement of progress to address homeless misery most likely.

One very visible difference between the civil rights movement and the SafeGround effort is "the opposition" during the civil rights period were fervid racists with snapping German Shepard dogs. The Sacramento City Council is wholly composed of bright, nice and reasonable people who, for the most part, want to find ways to make the city a happier place for everyone.

Another difference is that the civil rights movement had the character associated with heroic people hoping to expand everyone's sense of the arena of humanity: Leaders included Martin Luther King, Rosa Parks, John Lewis, and Roy Wilkins and attorney Thurgood Marshall. Meantime, SafeGround whines, endlessly, about victimization and has the characteristics of Libby Fernandez, Joan Burke, Tamie Dramer, John Kraintz and Tracie Rice-Bailey and attorneys Mark Merin and Cat Williams.

Woe, to be homeless in Sacramento.

This was not the first time Ms. Burke has evoked Rosa Parks as a suitable allusion to the SafeGround effort. Making a connection such as that is fanciful, ridiculous and truthy … and Ms. Burke should knock it off. Who does she think she is, Glenn Beck??

But there are features that campaigns for civil rights; gay rights; women's rights; rights for disabled people, and the effort to integrate homeless people into the community have in common: each expands the reach of humanity, making us all less tribal or insular. But success is always achieved if people understand the other's wariness and concerns.

Unhappily, the group of people in the far-far-Leftist homeless-services nonprofits, who are promoted as the homeless leaders in the vapid local media, promote victimization and denial of "rights" as the reason for their "protests via being annoying." Sheesh.


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…