Skip to main content

Odds and Ends

Two things / matters of interest that impact Homeless World Sacramento that I think y'all should know about:

----------

Many retired Sacramentans volunteer to help out at Loaves & Fishes and Volunteers of America and elsewhere to provide survival and other services to aid the homeless population.  It is interesting to learn that such volunteering likely is very good for the well-being of those who volunteer.

A newsbrief in the March 2010 issue of the small publication titled Mind, Mood and Memory tells us this:
Volunteering to Help Others May Stave Off Frailty
Pitching in to help other people may be a good way to stay strong as you grow older.  Researchers analysed data collected between 1988 and 1991 on 1,000 healthy, physically active adults in their 70s.  Compared to 19% of adults who had a job and 25% who cared for children, the 28 percent who volunteered to help out in their communities experienced a lower risk of becoming frail, even after allowing for factors such as disablity, age, and cognitive function researchers reported in the online Dec 16, 2009, issue of Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences.
A Health News article from United Press International speaks of the same news from the same source material in the Journal of Gerontology, and adds this:  "A randomized trial is needed to determine whether volunteering itself prevents the onset of frailty, or if there is something about the types of people who volunteer regularly that keeps them from becoming frail."

----------

Robert Tobin, president and CEO of Cottage Housing Inc., which operates both Serna Village and Quinn Cottages, wrote an opinion piece for the Bee that was published Friday, titled "Viewpoint: Safe Ground plan is not the answer."

A big problem with the piece is that Tobin's organization is, well, basically, a competator with the "Safe Ground plan" that he refers to.

The Safe Ground plan is to construct structures, possibly modified Tuff Sheds, as residences to house 50 to 100 homeless people on an as‑yet‑to‑be ‑found/‑determined 2‑ to 5‑ acre parcel somewhere in Sacramento proximate to RT services.

Tobin lists four objections to this Safe Ground plan [although he alludes to others]:
• It has not been implemented quickly as any "emergency" shelter, by definition, must.
• It is unlikely even to eventually accommodate a large percentage of those who remain unsheltered, replicating an Oregon project that never expanded beyond a 50-unit prototype since relocated from downtown Portland to property near the airport.
• It would substantially lower housing code protections for those who need them most.
• It is proving divisive when our community must unite around real solutions to difficult problems.
At this point ALL inexpensive options should go forward.  Surely, the SafeGround plan could go forward quickly if a majority of the powers that be, and others — hopefully, including Tobin — would just get behind it.

It is true that the plan would not accommodate "a large percentage of those who remain unsheltered," but it would provide shelter to many.  A variety of shelters that provide 'a space to be' to many would provide shelter to "a large percentage of those who remain unsheltered!

The community would have a varience to housing codes and would not lower them, generally.  Besides, a community of garden sheds, as Tobin calls them, is likely better [more comfortable; safer] than roughing it in a bag or blanket out on the street on a wet, cold night.

The plan is not devisive if a majority of folks who decide such things recognize that all viable options must go forward!  The wolf is at the door.  Let us get all the beds out there we can!

I have many misgivings about a Tuff Shed community, all of which differ from Tobin's.  I worry about the devisiveness/chaos that can ensue when people are living in such close quarters.  I worry about tempers arising and fights occuring when alcohol and other substances can easily be brought into such a village.

A great many homeless adults have substance-abuse problems. And of those many, a significant number of homeless men get angry easily when they are high. The problems associated with abuse of substances will not go away if we ignore them or pretend we can easily control their use, somehow.

The SafeGround encampments that there have been — in Camp Pollock and on C Street, for example — have experienced significant problems relating to substance abuse.

--------

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
"
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/marcos-breton/#storylink= It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…