Skip to main content

Questions for John Kraintz and those who really [I mean REALLY] want the best for him

John Kraintz, the ubiquitous visage of Sacramento homelessness, will forevermore be a central character in a significant international drama: Homelessness in Sacramento in the year 2009.

He worked hard; he wanted the best for his brothers and sisters in Homeless World Sac; he was on lots of committees; he was scruffy; and he was fully committed to homelessness, and bad hair, as a permanent condition.

When he dies, many many decades from now, there won't just be an obit notice in the online Bee, there will be a long story, rehashing his significance to a drama that was played out in front of the whole wide world. And there'll be mention of the 2019 Tarantino movie, "Homeless World" where he was played by Sean Penn, in a starring role. [with Uma Thurman as Sr. Libby; Meryl Streep as Joan Burke; Chris Rock in a tour de force comic-relief performance as Mayor Johnson; Amy Adams as Cynthia Hubert; Madonna as Tracy Rice-Bailey; Drew Barrymore as Cat Williams; and Brad Pitt as Garren Bratcher. And, in an Oscar-winning supporting role, a CGIed Johnny Weismueller playing Arnold Swartzenegger.]

BUT, just in case I'm mostly wrong about the paragraph above this one, and Homeless World Sacramento 2009 ISN'T one of our planet's more significant episodes, life will go on and John Kraintz will advance from the cusp of old age — where he now is — to the harsh reality of really being old. What happens next?

John, a question for ya: Are you REALLY a player in the mix when the hidden decisions regarding homelessness are made? Or you left outside in the tule fog, being more played than player?

When Safe Ground was really really really recognized as being a fully lost cause, were you in on that conversation? that realization? Or were you patted on the head, like the actor who plays Ronald McDonald in that hamburger joint's commercials? I mean, when the substantitive thinking was really happening; when clear-eyed reality was being recognized and analysed and dealt with; were you in the Hot Kitchen!? or, did that occur when you were left in the backyard?

They wouldn't have thought to pay you off, John, if you were really on the First String. But they did pay you off, didn't they, John? Didn't they? You and your safe ground buds got motel rooms for the winter. You got a long article about you in last Sunday's Bee. THAT was your gold watch and pension check, John. THAT. Only that.

To Cynthia, Kevin, Joan, Mark Esq, and Libby: If you give a hangnail about John Kraintz, get him a paying job and a life and a haircut and some credits on his social security tab such that when he retires fifteen years from now all things will be a little healthier and happier for him.

Your job isn't to leave the homeless homeless. Leaving people well fed in their ditches isn't your job; it's what your job isn't.

Mr. Mayor: If John Kraintz intends to stay homeless, then he needs to be taken off all those committees. The job of those committees should be focused-like-a-laser on ending misery, not sustaining it. And money for homelessness should be treated as something precious, not something that gets thrown about, rather willy-nilly, to smooth over political indelicacies.

To John: Take a job.  You are mighty and can do constructive things for the world.  You and the world can have a beautiful, ongoing partnership that becomes productive.  And continue to be on homelessness committees, while you have paid employment, if you want to.  But insist, unconditionally and absolutely, to be a player and not be played.  Accept nothing less.  Do it for all of us left behind.
See also a letter to the editor in the 11/20/09 Bee, written by Chip Powell, "Chasing a dollar on our dime."


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…