Skip to main content

Does Sacramento have the stride to step that far forward?

With a goal of providing 2400 units of permanent housing for the area homeless, Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson hopes to greatly impact and reduce homelessness over the next three year period, according to a report by KCRA, channel 3.

The mayor's initiative, titled Sacramento Steps Forward, will team him with dozens of business leaders.

The KCRA report also tells us "The mayor urged the community to be 'part of the solution,' and educate themselves about who Sacramento's homeless are."

Also, see Sac Bee report by Cynthia Hubert: "Sacramento homeless initiative eyes permanent, not emergency, shelter"

SacHo editorial:

From the first, this blog has been eager for the Sacramento metropolis to be better educated about the area homeless population. Unhappily, the region's news organizations preach the myths and are uninterested in reporting the reality.

It is the certain knowledge of this writer that homeless people here are in overwhelming majority good-hearted, thoughtful people endeavoring earnestly to pull their lives together — to get out of The Big Muddy¹, to be happier and productive. The chasm between what homeless people are truly like and what the general public thinks about the homeless could not be wider.

It is also apparent to the point of being a certain truth that Mayor Johnson is compassionate, fervent to understand his city, and eager to make things happen. Hooray all that.

I worry, though, about efforts that are too grandiose to succeed, seek too much to the point of being unjust, and get ahead of the learning curve of city and county elected officials and the general public.

Homeless people should not get a better deal from the government than people who put in forty hours of hard work at minimum wage and are trying to raise a couple of kids. I think the central economics lesson of the 20th Century and the current decade is that "you have to get the incentives right": People who play by the rules and keep their noses to the grindstone must be respected. It cannot be the case that people who have fallen out of their lives, for whatever reason, are given a Free Pass to a better, low-struggle life while a non-complaining citizen who is paying his own way, in full, is left to continue to wrestle, unaided, with life's alligators.

A "No Free Pass" concept is contrary to the SHOCking far-far-left politics of prime homeless services organizations and their attorneys in Sacramento. The far-far-left-of-Trotsky crowd has succeeded rather well with the mayor and seems to be the whole of the homeless-involved population that has his ear.

Within Homeless World Sacramento there are a great many people who do not complain, are little seen, but are scrappy multitaskers who try to make things happen in their lives, but with modest (albeit, often not enough) success. Too, there are people dealing with significant impediments to their having a productive life: Physical disabilities, cognitive impairment, significant mental-health maladies (like schizophrenia), and debilitating addictions (like alcoholism) are common.

Weirdly, the scrappy, the disabled, the impaired, the malady sufferers and the addicts get overlooked when help is available because they are not favored by the homeless-help industry which is focused — like a dog on a T-bone steak — on their whine, demand-our-rights, freedom-be-damned, put-an-end-to-capitalism agenda. Thus, those getting the perks in Homeless World are the feckless so-called "homeless leaders" whose prime distinction is that they are not leaders at all, but willing whistlers of the homeless-help industry tune — which is The Internationale. [I'm joking about The Internationale, but the rest, as unlikely as it may sound, is true, less a meager 10% added satiric content.]

The best thing that could happen in Homeless World Sacramento would be if there were, first, a revolution overturning things in the homeless-help industry that is esconsed here, creating a new improved-beyond-recognition homeless-help industry which was truly industrious in an effort at helping the homeless. What it is that the homeless need are safe, dry places to keep their things, including clothes on hangers and books and papers. We need places to sleep that don't require in "payment" that vast swatches of our time be gobbled up attending meaningless meetings or services given by people who are unprepared or classes that don't teach anything.

What Homeless World doesn't need is its army of volunteers. The default circumstance should be that all things get done "in house," so to speak, by the homeless themselves who have a myriad of unutilized skills. How absurdly pathetic it is that homeless-services nonprofits bring in volunteers to "help" the homeless, by denying the homeless the work that the volunteers provide.


Oop. Sorry, I forgot. This is an editorial about the mayor giving homeless people 2400 housing units. Sure, do it, Mr. Mayor. Give it a whirl. See if it can happen. [snort, snicker] We don't mind breathing mold. We're used to it. Of course, it's not as nice as a motel room. Is there room service with motel rooms that you provide? Mightn't it be cheaper just to buy us a couple dozen Motel 6's with Loaves & Fishes providing volunteers to give us room service?
¹ The Big Muddy, as Homeless folk know or can guess, is both Friendship Park after it's rained (~20 days/year) or been heavily hosed (whenever else its open). The Big Muddy is also the idea of being stuck in a terrible place (in our case, homelessness), the name coming from the Pete Seeger song "Waist Deep in the Big Muddy."


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…