Skip to main content

The mentally ill on the street

The following long blockquote is from Oliver Sachs's piece, published in the New York Review of Books, September 24 issue, titled "The Lost Virtue of the Asylum" [emphases mine]:
The movement for deinstitutionalization, starting as a trickle in the 1960s, became a flood by the 1980s, even though it was clear by then that it was creating as many problems as it solved. The enormous homeless population, the "sidewalk psychotics" in every major city, were stark evidence that no city had an adequate network of psychiatric clinics and halfway houses, or the infrastructure to deal with the hundreds of thousands of patients who had been turned away from the remaining state hospitals.

The anti-psychotic medications that had ushered in this wave of deinstitutionalization often turned out to be much less miraculous than originally hoped. They might lessen the "positive" symptoms of mental illness – the hallucinations and delusions of schizophrenia. But they did little for "negative" symptoms – the apathy and passivity, the lack of motivation and ability to relate to others – that were often more disabling than the positive symptoms. Indeed (at least in the manner they were originally used), the anti-psychotic drugs tended to lower energy and vitality and produce an apathy of their own. Sometimes there were intolerable side effects, movement disorders, like parkinsonism or tardive dyskinesia, which could persist for years after the medication had been stopped. And sometimes patients were unwilling to give up their psychoses, psychoses that gave meaning to their worlds and situated them at the center of these worlds. So it was common for patients to stop taking the anti-psychotic medicine they had been prescribed.

Thus many patients who were given anti-psychotic drugs and discharged had to be readmitted weeks or months later. I saw scores of such patients, many of whom said to me, in effect, "Bronx State is no picnic, but it is infinitely better than starving, freezing on the streets, or being knifed on the Bowery." the hospital, if nothing else, offered protection and safety – offered in a word, asylum.

By 1990 it was very clear that the system had overreacted, that the wholesale closings of state hospitals had proceeded far too rapidly, without any adequate alternatives in place. it was not wholesale closure that the state hospitals needed, but fixing: dealing with the overcrowding, the understaffing, the negligences and brutalities. For the chemical approach, while necessary, was not enough. We forgot the benign aspects of asylums, or perhaps we felt we could no longer afford to pay for them: the spaciousness and sense of community, the place for work and play, and for the gradual learning of social and vocational skills – a safe haven that state hospitals were well-equipped to provide.
In posting this, I'm not meaning to suggest we should go back to the way things were in the early 80s, when people were all-too-easily put in mental institutions, but we do need to correct today's situation where seriously mentally ill people are abandoned to the streets and left to try to subsist without any support at all.

One of the first programs, and probably THE VERY FIRST PROGRAM lost in Homeless World Sacramento when, in 2008, there was a flicker that the economy was going to tank was the VOA Outreach program to first identify seriously congnitively impaired people who were abandoned to the streets.

A significant percentage of homeless people are lost and alone, disoriented and abandoned, and they have no allies working to protect or rescue them. Woe the primary so-called homeless-advocacy agenciesLoaves & Fishes and VOA. They do not "step up" to address what should be the primary tasks of their mission. Loaves & Fishes does not have properly trained personnel in its Friendship Park. VOA, as I wrote, lopped off the most important program it had at the first whiff of economic hard times.

A related SacHo blogpost I hope you'll read, "The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia."


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…