Skip to main content

City of Sacramento takes a hard line, refuses settlement offer on Lehr v. Sac'to that county accepts

Maintaining that the city did nothing wrong, City Attorney Eileen Teichert said no to a settlement offer that would have ended the long-simmering contention between the city (and county) and the area homeless community. Teichert said "We regard this lawsuit as one of no liability by the city. We believe our handling of the property is lawful."

While the county accepted the settlement offer on Anthony Lehr, et al. vs. City of Sacramento, et al. [as it's formally known], paying $488,000 – which will fund (1) payments to homeless people who have lost property seized by the city and county police; (2) pay $100,000 to homeless-help organizations; (3) pay Merin; and (4) fund a bureaucracy to pay seized-property claims – the city will fight on, in the courts.

An order was written by a US District judge on Thursday allowing the continuance of Lehr v. Sac'to in the courts with homeless people being a recognized grouping of people for a class action.

This information comes from a Sacramento Bee article, "Sacramento County offers $488,000 in homeless lawsuit; city won't settle."


The thinking I'm hearing out in Homeless World Sacramento is that the city attorney doesn't actually believe that the city isn't culpable for the police actions – she is just pursuing a better deal than what was offered.

Mayor Kevin Johnson has recently gone way out of his way to demonstrate support for homeless people, spending a night at a non-legal homeless encampment named Safe Ground.

The lead attorney for the homeless contingent of plaintiffs, Mark Merin, told the Bee that City Attorney Eileen Teichert "has taken a hard line. Mayor Johnson is very positive toward the homeless and I think would like to have the matter resolved, but she has gone off in another direction." But both City Attorney Teichert and a spokesperson for the mayor brush away the suggestion that they are at odds.

Speaking for the mayor, an aid, Joaquin McPeek, said something curious: "Let's put the money toward providing housing for the homeless rather than into the courts fighting this issue."

Wull, yeah. And THAT could best be achieved if the city would settle NOW.


From the Loaves & Fishes website:
  • The press release, dated August 2, 2007, that first announced the lawsuit.
  • The suit, itself, as entered in District Court on August 1, 2007.


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

Homeless Sacramentans lose case that would have given them the right to set up outdoor camping

8/11/13 I certainly give attorneys Mark Merin and Cat Williams credit for pursuing a case against the city of Sacramento to give homeless Sacramentans the right to set up tents and a campsite. I wanted them to win their case, but they didn't. They lost it.

BUT, it is also necessary to look at the particulars of the case that Merin and Williams brought and see that the situation underlying the court case was not very compelling.

During the period eight years ago when 22 homeless campers set up their tents and brought in supplies to Mark Merin's vacant lot at C Street, near 12th, there was loud noise and plenty of other mayhem. Drug dealers were on the street encouraging buys from the campers. The Hernandez couple that lived in a house nearby were constantly being taunted by the campers, disrupting their lives.

Per always with Safe Ground camps, calm was deserted for the sake of boisterousness.

Leader John Kraintz and the other Safe Grounders would claim to have signed strict a…

The Mission Five Years Ago, And Today

I have spent the night the past two weeks plus at the Union Gospel Mission and am having an excellent time of it -- not only regards to sleeping in the dorm that the mission has, but also listening to the sermons that are delivered in the early evening. The Christmas music that is performed is also splendid. [And the food -- the FOOD -- has been fantastic during my stay so far! A happier Tom there couldn't be.] I chatted with a pal last night about The Mish – about how things were about five years ago when we both used the mission’s services frequently, and how thing are, today.
Five years ago, there were a lot scuffles between the guys when the front gate was opened in the early afternoon and in the area near the contact window there were some brawls as guys fought over where guys were in line to get a bed in the dorm.
Nowadays, however, the mission is very much a peaceful place both on the grounds of the facility and and out on the street.
I do not know what transformative eve…