Skip to main content

Hannity remarks on Tent City

In a section of his blog Hannity's America, the far-rightwing media pundit Sean Hannity of Fox News channel had something to say about Tent City today. The section in his post was called "Tent City Tricks." Here are his remarks:
Liberals love to talk about homelessness, you know, because new crops of homeless people require new forms of government intervention.

Recently, Sacramento's tent city, which is home to a large homeless population, has attracted a lot of media attention. Oprah, for example, sent a correspondent to tent city in order to "humanize the recession," and suggested that tent city sprang up as the American economy tanked and Americans were forced out of their homes.

But apparently, the facts suggest otherwise. According to a Sacramento homeless activist, the homeless have camped there for decades, and while media outlets peddled the idea that families were driven from their homes, the reality is that, "90 percent of encampment residents were 'chronically homeless' single individuals living on the streets for extended periods."

Then again, the mainstream media aren't exactly famous for letting the facts get in the way of a good story.
While Hannity is certainly right that the media – mainstream, included – didn't let facts get in the way of the "humanize the recession" story everyone was after, he's narrowly wrong about several things.

There have been stray tents and small groupings of tents in the Tent City location, east of Blue Diamond Almond, but never the more-significant community that was there beginning in late November. Police roustings of small groupings of tents in Sacramento, including the collection of tents near North B and Bannon and in so-called Crack Alley led to a more significant population in the Tent City location. The population there was never more than 300, and not the 1200 souls that some news organizations reported.

While Hannity is right that there simply were not many families in Tent City, it was not the case that 90% who were there were among the chronically homeless. It was a high percentage, but not that high. The chronically homeless is usually defined as people who have been homeless for a year or more, including the past three months.

Also, being a wingnut, Hannity loves to mischaracterize liberals. Liberal don't love government intervention, they just dislike human suffering. Go figure.

Comments

Unknown said…
If, and I assume you were, the "homeless activist" to whom Hannity was referring, doesn't it make you proud as the day is long that SEAN HANNITY, of all people, is quoting YOU to make an argument against the damn liberals? :-) :-(
Unknown said…
No, I wasn't the "homeless activist" that was referred to.

I would never have said that Tent City had been at that location for decades.

I'm proud to say I did not add to any argument against the liberals.
Steve said…
As a Gilda Radner character on SNL would have said, "NEVERMIND."
Unknown said…
Ooop. Wait a minute! Hannity well MIGHT have learned about the "decades" thing from this blog. See my post Robert V. Tobin's assessments of Sac'to homelessness where Robert Tobins says the fact allaying the fiction is that "homeless people have camped there [ie, the Tent City location] for decades.

ALSO, Hannity's quote "90 percent of encampment residents were 'chronically homeless' single individuals living on the streets for extended periods." is in my blogpost, coming from Tobin's article in Politics Daily.

BUT it is most likely Hannity didn't see my blogpost, but instead just Tobin's article. I say that because Hannity rips liberals and Politics Daily is a liberal webspace. And because Tobin is clearly advocating for funding for his industry, transitional housing.

Popular posts from this blog

Loaves & Fishes implicates Buddhism and Jack Kornfield in its June Donations Plea.

The Sukhothai Traimit Golden Buddha was found in a clay-and-plaster overlaid buddha statue in 1959, after laying in wait for 500 years. It's huge and heavy: just under 10 feet tall and weighs 5 1/2 tons. At the beginning of their June newsletter , Loaves and Fishes relates a story, taken from the beginning of renowned Buddhist teacher Jack Kornfield's 2008 book The Wise Heart: A Guide to the Universal Teachings of Buddhist Psychology . The first part and first chapter in Kornfield's book is "Part I: Who are you really?" and chapter 1 is called "Nobility: Our Original Goodness," which ought to serve as a clue to what the beginning of the book is about, not that that sentiment isn't strewn through-out the chapter, section and book such that what Kornfield is telling us should be crystal clear. Somehow, the not-ready-for-primetime management at Loaves & Fishes have managed to use Kornfield's wise and kindly words in a way that mangles th...

In an act of Collective Punishment, Loaves & Fishes closes its park in the morning on New Year’s Day

Calvin [a "green hat" in Unfriendly Park] makes the argument for continued incompetent management. Hobbes represents me — only, in real life, I don't have that good a coat . In an act of Collective Punishment, Loaves & Fishes closes its park in the morning on New Year’s Day In one respect — and only one — that I can think of, Loaves & Fishes is NOT hypocritical: The management hates the way America is run and wants to turn it into a backward communist country . Consistent with that, Loaves & Fishes’ management runs its facility like a backward communist country. The People’s Republic of Loaves & Fishes. A seemingly minor thing happened on New Year’s Day. A couple of people smoked a joint in Loaves & Fishes’ Friendship Park and one of the park directors, or both of them, determined, at about 10am, that, in retribution, they would punish all the homeless there by closing the park for the day. This is something the managers of the park do all the ...

The Big Picture (The good, the bad and the ugly in Homeless World Sacramento) Part I

If you prick us do we not bleed? If you tickle us do we not laugh? If you poison us do we not die? -- William Shakespeare, Merchant of Venice While I feel certain that homeless people (including myself) deserve the sympathies and aid of the public and much robust support from the government, I don’t think this because I believe Sacramento’s homeless population could pass as a cross section of the general population (as we're often portrayed). The homeless, who are the bottom 1% socially and economically in our society are, as you would suppose, disproportionate to the whole in being mentally ill; or mentally unusual; or psychically beat up; or depressed; or addicted; or in having quirks or criminal records or spotty resumes or damaged psyches that frustrate getting or holding onto a job. Too, among the homeless are a great many who are asocial – who will steal or destroy things without a moment’s consideration of others who are hurt by these actions. There are also man...