Skip to main content

Gimme shelter

Now that we, the Sac'to Homeless, have that shelter-axing proposal thing hanging over us like a swinging sword of Damocles, other issues seem tamed and trivial in comparison. As Shakespeare could've said, "Uneasy lies the head that doesn't have a pillow." Yes, Bill, especially so on cold, rainy nights.

It is probably the case that the county is playing a game of chicken.

Eventually, either the county or the city or the stimulus fund will pony up and allow the homeless to survive. Maybe. Each thinks in regard to the other: It's your problem!

But the homeless have no political power! We donate so extremely little to campaign funds! Agencies that advocate for themselves – I mean "us" – are so slimy and morally compromised. But politicos, listen to them! to them!

Val Jon Farris wrote a nice piece, yesterday, called "The Anthology of Homelessness," about the path to existence devastation.

Existence devastation is at hand, y'all.

One might think that when times got tough, the government would extend its hand to the homeless as more, from the middle class, were added to its ranks. One might think that we would all pull up our boots, pull on our work gloves, and make sure that everyone is taken care of. That nobody falls in the cracks. But that is never what happens.

People fall in the cracks. Because other people forget their basic good natures when they are made busy worrying about themselves.

But what the government does, even with the wise Barrack Obama at the helm, is it contracts. And those that scream the loudest – meaning the rich, per usual – retain the greater portion of gov't largess. The homeless get pushed off the cliff, because Oprah viewers have only so much patience. And care only, really, mostly, about themselves. They care about the homeless only so far as it has liberal cache.

In his excellent blogpost, Val Jon writes,
... until we can place ourselves intimately inside the emotional experience of these remarkable people we will have no true compassion or appreciation for them. And ... until we learn how to engage with the homeless population from a place of profound respect and dignity, a place in which we work with them on solutions rather than dictating to them what we think they need, our efforts will be ineffective.

To successfully explore the Anthology of Homelessness I ask that you set aside whatever reasoning you may have about why people become homeless and simply accept the fact that it happens.
After that, Val Jon shows the path – but I'm not sure that just asking people, as he has, to, flatly, without justification-finding or blame-seeking, accept that homeless people are in a circumstance of misery, is enough.

Maybe, if we sit quietly, we can bring to the fore our natural empathetic instincts, the most formitable level of which is empathetic concern, full-throttle compassion. Or, in contemporary Buddhist terms, Great Karuna.


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…