Skip to main content

Sac County raises barrier for indigent persons to receive medical services

In a press release, today, the County of Sacramento has made it much more difficult for U.S. citizens to receive medical services through CMISP [County Medically Indigent Services Program]. The release tells us new barriers to receive services begin today.

Non-citizens will be denied service unless they are legal immigrants. And American citizens [along with legal immigrants] will need to either come up with difficult-to-obtain proof of U.S. citizenship or immigration status, or, for the citizen, get an affidavit. Quoting the press release, "a Written Affidavit signed under penalty of perjury by the [citizen] applicant and another individual with direct knowledge of the applicant’s citizenship will be accepted" in lieu of requested documentation.

The press release tells us, "Services for communicable diseases will continue to be provided without requiring eligibility for CMISP. Some examples of communicable diseases are tuberculosis, meningitis, and sexually transmitted diseases." Testing and receipt of a TB card is among these exempted services.

Documents that will prove U. S. citizenship or immigration status, to be eligible for CMISP, include the following. Copies of the documents will be accepted.
•Adoption Decree/Records
•Baptismal Certificate
•U. S. Public Birth Certificate
•Certification of Birth Abroad
•Church Records
•Census Records
•Hospital Records
•INS Certificate of Citizenship
•Indian Agency Records
•Northern Mariana ID Card
•Marriage/Divorce Records
•Military Records
•Naturalization Papers
•School Records
•U.S. Passport
•Document issued from Department of State
•Document issued from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), formerly known as Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
"
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/marcos-breton/#storylink= It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…