Skip to main content

Marcos Breton is a Fool and an Ignoramous

Photo kiped from the Loaves & Fishes webspace.

For the second week in a row, Marcos Breton has demonstrated his profound ignorance of the homeless situation in Sacramento. It must be that Breton never leaves the office. this week's column is entitled "Too much hypocrisy on homeless," and concludes with this sentiment, "Sacramento is compassionate toward the homeless – maybe too compassionate."

In the middle of his article he spends a lot of time talking about nearby cities and communities who, he says, wouldn't stand to have homeless people in their midst. He cites the communities of the Fabulous 40s, Curtis Park, Land Park, the McKinley Park area, East Sacramento and the Pocket. And the 'burbs, near and far, El Dorado Hills, Granite Bay, Carmichael, Fair Oaks, Rocklin and Roseville. [btw, Breton DOESN'T get so far-afield to mention Fairfield, where, it was reported, yesterday, in the The Vacaville Reporter, the go-ahead has been given to build a $7.7 million, 23,985 square-feet homeless shelter-and-support center on a 3-acre site.]

A scant fifty years ago, Breton might have easily been able to cite many communities within and cities near Sacramento who wouldn't have standed to have "negros" living near them. Fortunately, we've come a long, long way toward overcoming THAT prejudice. In India, fifty years ago, there was a common prejudice again so-called Untouchables. Happily, India has significantly overcome THAT prejudice.

So, how were India's Untouchables treated? Here's what it says in The Laws of Manu, as published in the 1997 edition of The Oxford Dictionary of World Religions:

"Their dwelling place shall be outside of the village, and their wealth shall consist of dogs and donkeys. Their clothes shall be garments of corpses, their food eaten from broken dishes. Their ornaments shall be of black iron, and they are condemned to wandering from place to place."

Well, we don't own any donkeys that I know of, but we homeless do have dogs; we do eat from dishes others wouldn't have; we CERTAINLY wear garments formerly owned by people now deceased and there's a lot of wandering from place to place, that's for sure. So far, we haven't been kicked out of every village that Breton can name, but that may come.

One more thing, near the end, Breton passed on this foolishness:

We also need an acknowledgment that some people can't or won't take help. For example, Kraintz [a long-time homeless fellow] predicted that some people in the current homeless camp would not go to a shelter at Cal Expo – Sacramento's temporary solution to illegal camping.

"It's about freedom, man," he said.

What Breton doesn't understand is that staying at the shelter at Cal Expo [aka, Winter Shelter and Overflow] means a person must arrive at the Delany Center, in the Loaves & Fishes facility, at ~3:30pm every day for transport to Cal Expo.

You are held at the shelter where you must stay in the dorm area [or smoke at an enclosed area outside or go to the bathroom in an area outside]. Two usually-very-violent movies are shown, but they are frequently interupted by chatter, or dinner, or the shelter staffs' caprice.

A breakfast of cereal is served before the sheltered are bussed back to the Delany Center at 5:30AM. At 5:30, in the cold and dark, there's nothing for most of us to do but wait for Loaves & Fishes's Friendship Park to open (on weekdays; it's not open on weekends), at 7:02AM, or for weekend lunch tickets which are given out beginning at 8:00AM.

Thus, you see, 15 1/2 hours {!!!!!} of each and every day is consumed by staying at the shelter, not including the time getting to the Delany Center each afternoon. That's A LOT of time for sleep, gruel, and a dinner (which is famously stinting). [And then there is this chestnut: The shelter does not provide showers.] [And a second chestnut: On the men's side, though the tables for eating are empty except during meals, management will not allow men to sit at them outside mealtime. A man cannot sit down to write or read or study. Make do with your bunkbed or one of the few benchs, if available, or "that's tough." Also, though not strictly enforced, the rule from time to time is that men may bring only toiletries to the shelter, in a clear bag.]

But the worst thing about it is that the time-devouring shelter MAKES IT NEAR IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE ANY MOVE TO BETTER ONESELF. People using the Overflow shelter cannot take or keep employment [because of the tight time constraints].


Nagarjuna said…
Have you written to Breton, or is he otherwise aware of how your articulate insider's take on homelessness differs from his outsider's perception?

I was really struck by your description of how inefficient procedures to help homeless people make it all-but impossible for those who wish to improve their circumstances to do so.

I saw Mayor Johnson on CNN today talking about the imminent closing down of the so-called "tent city" that has received such widespread exposure in the media lately, and I thought how great it would be if there were some way that you could share your insights and recommendations with him or with others in positions to make a difference. You could be a great spokesperson for the homeless, and, in so doing, perhaps find a way out of homelessness yourself.
Nagarjuna said…
However, as a follow-up comment to my previous one, I don't think calling someone unflattering names is likely to make them receptive to your message. :-)
Tom said…
[I should mention that Nagarjuna and I live in the same city and that after his comments, I responded to him via email.]


It is true that the title of this blogpost is unflattering (duh!) and unkind. But more so is the content, and that was, well, rather unavoidable. Afterall, I was intent on making the connection between his view of Sac'to homelessness AND racism and caste hatred.

Breton's column is *seemingly* friendly, but what he really says, if you scrape aside the icing, is noxious.

His POV becomes a "race to the bottom," with all communities pushing homeless people away from them. Leaving homeless people where, exactly? Nowhere?

Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…