Skip to main content

Welfare spending likely to be cut severely

Sacramento county Department of Human Assistance.
"Agencies that serve some of society's most vulnerable people are slashing staff and canceling services in anticipation of state budget cuts to welfare programs," reads the news in a frontpage article in today's Bee. And this:

If the proposed cuts pass, welfare recipients could see their benefits drop by 10 percent. A family of three would see their monthly check reduced to about $620 – as much as they would have received in 2000 or 2001 – plus about $250 in food stamps. Social Security benefits for needy elderly and disabled people would be cut. Benefits would be cut to virtually all other welfare programs, as well.

Perhaps the most tangible effect of the cuts would be staffing reductions that could erode the ability to help welfare recipients find jobs and delay applications being processed for food stamps and other aid, officials said.

"We're not talking about paper clips and furniture," said [Bruce] Wagstaff[, director of the Department of Human Assistance in Sacramento County]. "We're talking about the ability to respond to clients who are in crisis."

The cuts that will come are draconian. At a time when the number of people at the bottom in Sacramento [and all over the country] is increasing and is sure to continue to increase rapidly, due to the floundering economy, resources to these people is quickly starting to dry up. Homeless Sacramentans will feel the effects for, at least, the next several years.

Homeless people, and, indeed, all Sacramentans, should be angry about the circumstance. While Republicans in our state legislature are careful to protect the wealthiest people in our state from even so much as a 1% surtax on the second million that they make in a year, the dirt poor are going to suffer a 10% cut in what little they have to survive.

Instead of a philosopy where "everyone is in this together," wealthy insiders are getting bailed out by the government, while the poorest citizens are left to suffer more indignation, mounting suffering on suffering that's already being experienced. Commonsense should tell us that the growing population of poor and homeless are the folks most in need of "enough to get by," and should be the first beneficiaries of a "bail out." Instead the "almost invisible," the almost forgotten, the lowest caste is punished the worst -- in an economy that is failing because of wealthy people's greed.

An irony here is that money given to poor people is likely to be near-immediately spent! That is, getting money to poor folk is the best, quickest way to give the economy the boost that it needs.


Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
Read more here: It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…