Skip to main content

State Republicans Target Homeless Mental-Health Services

It now official. Republicans state lawmakers have put forward a proposal that would siphon off funds dedicated to funding mental health services for homeless adults to help reduce the looming humongous budget deficit, now projected to be $40 billion over the next 18 months.

According to an article in yesterday’s San Francisco Chronicle, titled “GOP budget plan: Slash $10 billion from schools,” diverting Prop 63 funds away from homeless services is part of a $22 billion measure California Republican assemblymen and state senators are proposing.

Proposition 63 – which was passed by California voters in 2004 – assesses a 1% surtax on taxpayer earnings exceeding $1,000,000 per year for the specific use of mental-health services. Republicans want to eliminate the programs the surtax funds and, instead, use the approximate $1 billion raised in 18 months for “general use” - that is, to partially plug the huge state deficit.

To accomplish their plans, in whole or part, the Republican lawmakers, who are a minority in both the state senate and assembly, would have to reach agreement with the majority Democrats and Republican Governor Swartzenegger, who sides mostly with the Democrats on budget issues. Changing Prop 63 would also require approval of California voters in a special election.

[This is an update of information posted yesterday in SacHo on the threat to homeless mental-health funding: "Enormous State Deficit Threatens Funding for Homeless Mental-Health Programs."]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
"
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/marcos-breton/#storylink= It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…