Skip to main content

Rev. Brian Baker, Gay Marriage and the Arc of the Moral Universe

Front page of July 5 Sac Bee
The headline article in the Sacramento Bee last Sunday, July 5, “Ruling Doesn’t Move Clergy,” caught the attention of some of Sacramento's homeless citizens since most-prominently mentioned of area religious leaders surveyed for the article was Very Rev. Dr. Brian Baker of Trinity Episcopal Cathedral in midtown. Trinity Cathedral, as most homeless folk know, is very active in seeking better lives and justice for homeless people. Beyond speaking up for Sacramento’s homeless citizens, Trinity Cathedral provides a meal for homeless people one evening each fortnight and collaborates with Safe Ground’s Pilgrimage program to make available a safe space for homeless people to sleep one or two nights each month.

The recent Bee article, however, wasn't at all about homelessness; instead, it was about area religious leaders’ reactions to the recent Supreme Court decision mandating the legality of same-sex marriage throughout the country.

. ...  ..Rev. Baker's sentiment in support of
  ... ...gay marriage contrasted with Imam
  ... ...Mumtaz Qasni's opposition.
What caught my eye and stirred some discussion among my homeless pals was one particular thing that Baker said that the Bee used as a breakout quote: “I believe marriage equality is the will of God and brings us closer to the kingdom of heaven.”

There are two elements in those words of Baker’s that seemed controversial. One was Baker’s apparent claim to know “the will of God.” Pat Robertson of TV’s “The 700 Club,” notoriously, often claims to know precisely what God thinks. On April 30, Robertson claimed “the U.S. will face divine punishment if gay marriage becomes legal nationwide.”

Robertson also said on that day,
…the purported persecution in the U.S. of gays is much like when a group of men tried to rape angels in the story of Sodom and Gomorrah: “Who was on top, who was controlling things? It was the homosexuals. But who had the last word? It was God Almighty when he destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah.”
The other problem in Baker’s words was how he got around the many instances in the Bible – including the Sodom and Gomorrah story – where God seems to be virulently damning of homosexual sex and the people engaging in those acts. In other words, On what basis can Baker claim that marriage equality might “bring us closer to the kingdom of heaven?”

I sent the Very Reverend Dr. Baker an email asking aid in understanding how he could know the will of God and how his words could comport with the Bible and was flabbergasted that, in his responses, he fully, convincingly justified his words quoted in the Bee – including his claim that God does not in any way damn gay people or their sexual practices.

Baker wrote this in his email response to the notion that him knowing the will of God seemed arrogant in a manner akin to Pat Robertson:
Let me say a couple of things in response.  First, I began my remark with "I believe."  I don't know the will of God in a way others may claim they know the will of God.  I would not claim to know much of the mystery of God with certainty.  That said, I believe that God is the gravitational pull that is bending the arc of the moral universe toward justice. I believe that allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry is the just and loving thing to do and I believe that it will provide the context for more loving couples to thrive.  I believe it will allow for more love in the world and in that sense, I believe it is in line with the will of God.  That is what I believe but I know I could also be wrong. 
Second, I was intentionally grand in my statement in order to provide a counter-witness to Pat Robertson and others who claim to speak for all Christians.
Great, I thought. There are two definitions of the word “believe.” One is to have an absolute conviction that what you think is inerrantly the capital-T Truth. A second definition of “believe” – which Baker effectively tells us was his meaning of the word in the quote in the Bee article – is to just have strong confidence in the truth of your assertion. Thus, Baker was not at all claiming to have a red phone on his desk, a hotline to God – like Robertson and some other pastors overtaken by narcissism seem to think they have. 

As for Baker neutralizing the Bible’s many passages where it seems gay people and their sexual practices are damned, the good reverend directed me to a videotaped teaching, “Jesus and the Gays,” he gave that dispels claims that the Bible finds gay people and their sexual practices to be loathsome.

I greatly encourage readers of this blog post to view the video. 

Baker wrote this to me in his email regarding his lecture: “I would argue there is nothing in the bible that condemns gay relationships as we understand them. There are a few passages that, if approached with an anti gay bias, you can twist to support your agenda, but that isn't supported with a critical reading of the bible.”

A five-page outline of the lecture can be downloaded here: JesusandtheGaysOutline.docx
---

Just as a matter of disclosure, I am compelled to inform readers that I, Tom Armstrong, the writer of this post, am not a Christian, nor a believer in any God. I see myself as a Buddhist, a bad Buddhist, a slacker. No Gods talk to me and I don't think they have a voice to be heard.

I do applaud the Supreme Court decision mandating the legality of gay marriage throughout the country. I think the decision was rightly decided, granting marriage as a civil right for gay Americans, and not -- as Chief Justice Roberts would have had it, as he proclaimed in his dissent to the Court's decision -- a matter that should be left to the lawmakers of every state.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sex, Lies and Exegesis

Definition: exegesis [ek-si-jee-sis]: critical explanation or interpretation of a text or portion of a text, especially of the Bible. Painting by He Qi , a prominent artist from China who focuses on Christian themes. This piece is inspired by The Song of Solomon. In his May 21 column, New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof stirred up a hornets’ nest. His column wasn’t really a column, it was a quiz, titled “ Religion and Sex Quiz .” The questions and what he provided as the answers were provocative, to say the least. We would later learn, in his follow-up, a post to the Times online in the afternoon of the same day, “ Reader Comments on my Religion Quiz ,” that the information that was used to create the quiz came with the help of Bible scholars, “including Jennifer Knust, whose book inspired [the quiz], and … Mark Jordan of Harvard Divinity School.” Kristof doesn’t name Knust’s book, but a quick googling reveals that it must certainly be Unprotected Texts: The Bible’s...

In an act of Collective Punishment, Loaves & Fishes closes its park in the morning on New Year’s Day

Calvin [a "green hat" in Unfriendly Park] makes the argument for continued incompetent management. Hobbes represents me — only, in real life, I don't have that good a coat . In an act of Collective Punishment, Loaves & Fishes closes its park in the morning on New Year’s Day In one respect — and only one — that I can think of, Loaves & Fishes is NOT hypocritical: The management hates the way America is run and wants to turn it into a backward communist country . Consistent with that, Loaves & Fishes’ management runs its facility like a backward communist country. The People’s Republic of Loaves & Fishes. A seemingly minor thing happened on New Year’s Day. A couple of people smoked a joint in Loaves & Fishes’ Friendship Park and one of the park directors, or both of them, determined, at about 10am, that, in retribution, they would punish all the homeless there by closing the park for the day. This is something the managers of the park do all the ...

Loaves & Fishes implicates Buddhism and Jack Kornfield in its June Donations Plea.

The Sukhothai Traimit Golden Buddha was found in a clay-and-plaster overlaid buddha statue in 1959, after laying in wait for 500 years. It's huge and heavy: just under 10 feet tall and weighs 5 1/2 tons. At the beginning of their June newsletter , Loaves and Fishes relates a story, taken from the beginning of renowned Buddhist teacher Jack Kornfield's 2008 book The Wise Heart: A Guide to the Universal Teachings of Buddhist Psychology . The first part and first chapter in Kornfield's book is "Part I: Who are you really?" and chapter 1 is called "Nobility: Our Original Goodness," which ought to serve as a clue to what the beginning of the book is about, not that that sentiment isn't strewn through-out the chapter, section and book such that what Kornfield is telling us should be crystal clear. Somehow, the not-ready-for-primetime management at Loaves & Fishes have managed to use Kornfield's wise and kindly words in a way that mangles th...