Skip to main content

Libby Fernandez and The Loaf & Fish go their separate ways

In an issue of the Bee that was on my birthday, it is announced that Libby Fernandez and Loaves & Fishes are parting.

Of course, the article is written as if Libby could have stayed at L&F forever. But the truth of the hows and whys of the parting is something we are likely not to ever know.

All I truly know is that Libby will be gone from Loaves in June -- and that offers an opportunity for renewal of the facility and hope that the most-troubled homeless people will have a wider path to happier lives.

In a blogpost coming in a week or so I will write about Libby and why she was never a good match with the job as Director.

The Bee article tells us that Libby is starting a bicycle ministry. Or, maybe a tricycle ministry; there is some confusion -- Perhaps only mine -- on this point.

Anyway, goodbye, Libby.

A follow-up article about Libby and Loaves going their separate ways was published the next day in the Bee. It seems Libster ISN'T going to move to Altoona. Rather she will stick around Sacramento in her evil plot to annoy me.

At the end of the 1/26/17 article, a quote -- in all caps -- from the Lib is printed. This:
Sister Libby Fernandez, executive director of Loaves & Fishes
As I wrote earlier, I will -- in a week or so -- get to the hardscrabble problems that Fernandez imposes on the world, but just as a quick exercise, let us first get into what is wrong with Libby's quote, above.

For starters, it is in all-caps.  Very likely the journalist who wrote the piece chose the all-caps thing rather than Lib. But, also likely, the all-caps mode seemed appropriate to Cynthia Hubert, the reporter, for several reasons. All caps is bigger! vaster! more enormous! more pompous!

Whoops. Pardon me while I try to regain my composure. A-hem. It's back. Thanks. Let me start, again.

The problems with the quote are several. For starters, Libby suggests in the quote that BEFORE she stops and meets someone they ARE NOT her equal. The question then arises "In what sense is the nature of 'equal' being evoked?"

People are different. Each of us is different from every other. Perhaps what Libby is driving at is that both she and some anonymous homeless person are "equal in the eyes of God." But that doesn't seem right since any "long, slow dance toward trust" is, necessarily, something SHE is pursuing -- and it is not the case that Libby is an agent of God, here.

So, is what Libby is trying to address "the nature of empathy"? We do feel like we have an equal footing when empathy comes into play, when we believe we feel the other's pain and struggles.

Unfortunately, as philosopher Paul Bloom points out in his brilliant recent book "Against Empathy," we make a cascade of mistakes when we "evoke" empathy to try to understand someone else. We end up imposing what WE think on the circumstance and thinking of someone else. People are wildly complicated and have a tremendous amount of stuff going on in both their external lives and in the tempest swirling around in their brain.

Bloom's book was cited by the New York Post as a Best Book of 2016. The text for that citation began with these two paragraphs:
We often think of our capacity to experience the suffering of others as the ultimate source of goodness. Many of our wisest policy-makers, activists, scientists, and philosophers agree that the only problem with empathy is that we don’t have enough of it.

Nothing could be farther from the truth, argues Yale researcher Paul Bloom. In AGAINST EMPATHY, Bloom reveals empathy to be one of the leading motivators of inequality and immorality in society. Far from helping us to improve the lives of others, empathy is a capricious and irrational emotion that appeals to our narrow prejudices. It muddles our judgment and, ironically, often leads to cruelty. We are at our best when we are smart enough not to rely on it, but to draw instead upon a more distanced compassion.
Libby's central failure to accept input from other Loaf & Fish employees is demonstrative of her inability to take in the wisdom of others. She is Trumpian at insisting only she knows what is right at all times.

Since the reality is that she doesn't know any large fraction of everything she needed to know to do her job as Director at L&F -- because she refused input from others -- her ability to help others in the ministry she envisions she will start, beginning in June, is likely to be encumbered with problems that don't have a means to be addressed.

More on all this later -- in about a week.


Popular posts from this blog

The devastating effects of schizophrenia in one man's life

A powerful story of the deteriorating life and death of once-respectable Sacramento citizen, Mike Lehmkuhl,  is told by  reporter Cynthia Hubert in Sunday’s [7/31/16] Bee.
Lehmkuhl is described as a very likable guy with a sometimes-goofy personality that went along with a formidable intelligence. He was a “standout wrestler” in high school and an “accomplished gymnast at Sacramento State” where he graduated and then got into the building trade before going on to run a contracting business and have a home proximate to Country Club Plaza.
Friends describe him as being “happy” and “sanguine” at that time in his life, when he was about age 50.
But, by 2011, when Lehmkuhl was 53, he was hearing voices in his head and his life began to fall apart. He tumbled into a homeless life, combatting demons in his head that spoke to him. The Hubert piece provides a comprehensive picture of a good man beset by a devastating condition: schizophrenia. Lehmkuhl had good friends and loyal family members…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the SelfWhat is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…