Skip to main content

What does "Christ is my savior" mean?

M. Scott Peck, in his “Stages of Spirituality” from his book The Different Drum touches on the idea of what the statement “Jesus is my savior” would mean to people at different levels of spiritual growth.

Peck expanded his view on how Jesus is a savior in an interview / book review by Ben Paterson, published in Christianity Today, timed for the release of Peck’s then-new book People of the Lie (1985).

Quoting Paterson from the review:
I asked [Peck] what he meant when he called Christ "Savior." He suggested that there are three ways to understand what it means to call him Savior. One way is to think of him as Savior in the sense that he atones for our sins. Peck termed that "my least popular level." A second way is to see him as Savior in the sense that he is "a kind of fairy godmother who will rescue you when you get in trouble as long as you remember to call upon his name." Peck believes that Jesus does just that. A third way to see Jesus as Savior is to see him as the one who shows the way to salvation through his life and his death. So Peck likes Jesus the Savior as fairy godmother (a term I am sure he does not use flippantly) and as exemplar, or one who shows us how to live and die. But he does not like the idea of Jesus the atoner.

Jesus as atoner: Jesus makes amends for your bad deeds.
Jesus as rescuer: Jesus gets you out of trouble.
Jesus as exemplar: Jesus is an example of how you should be.
In all fairness, Peck does not reject the idea of Jesus as atoner, he just does not see that as very helpful in the healing of human evil. Why? Because, in his view, it compromises human responsibility. He thinks that as long as we think Jesus has done it all for us we will be encouraged to live passively in the face of our own sin and evil.
At the mission, and I suppose - from my limited knowledge - it is true for Protestant Christianity, generally, “saved by grace” is the key, and the doing of good deeds is widely disparaged.

As I understand it [and accept as Scriptural, reasonable and logical, thanks to David's (of Heart Talk Ministries) help], good-deeds doing is rejected because of the inclination people might have to do good for the wrong motivation. If you’re doing good in an effort to, effectively, “buy your way” into heaven, then you are leading yourself astray.

The ticket to heaven comes to you “as a gift,” we are told. You just have to accept it. It is in this sense that Jesus is just, merely the atoner. But what kind of justice is this? And what kind of heaven can there be if the place is filled with people who very self-interestedly snatch the easy-to-grab ring to escape responsibilities for whatever awful things they did in life?

The problem, then, with going for the easy grab [“saved by grace”] is that it’s little different than the problem of good deeds done for the wrong motivation [getting to heaven via good works]. Both can be wholly selfishly motivated.

Another Christian path to heaven, that Peck doesn’t mention, is the combination of “easy grab” — accepting the gift of salvation — and necessarily following up on it with the ‘goodness’ of deeds and works that are rightly motivated. This would fill the bill of “But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?” as proclaimed in the Book of James 2:20.

OK, fine. But what, exactly, are good works rightly motivated? Faith motivates good works in a right way, how?

I think that here it has to be that one is now using Christ as one’s exemplar. To have faith in Christ and then take action, the action you take has to be with the same feeling Christ had for the meaning of life: to be unselfish; feel others’ suffering; and be motivated by compassion to act for others’ well-being.

And this "rightly motivated" action must not be faked!  Just as we're supposed to not be self-satified self-righteous individuals but, instead, actually be righteous in such a way that it is internalized and without our self-congratulating, looking-down-on-others awareness, we should have Christ as our exemplar without faking it. We should act in the way that we want to, and the way that we want to act should be good and compassionate because that [That! That!] has become our nature.

So. Peck is right (I think)! Jesus as exemplar is the most-proper meaning of "Christ as savior." I do wonder how many people, at the mission either at the pulpit or seated on the floor of the chapel, think of “Christ is my savior” in that way. [I write that, not because I think there are none; it is just that I don't know.]

I think most of my Christian friends would object:  It all comes from faith, not from 'imitating' Christ, they'd say.  Faith, once you've stewed in it, awhile, manifests in you becoming a new being. And the fruit of being made anew is the drive to be good, act good, do good.

Yes. Yes.  But I don't think that 'faith alone' carries that much oomph.  People from many religions find their way to be Christ-like.  There are realized Sufi mystics, and Buddhist mystics and Taoist mystics and Hindu mystics, all of whom share qualities found in Christ.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The devastating effects of schizophrenia in one man's life

A powerful story of the deteriorating life and death of once-respectable Sacramento citizen, Mike Lehmkuhl,  is told by  reporter Cynthia Hubert in Sunday’s [7/31/16] Bee.
Lehmkuhl is described as a very likable guy with a sometimes-goofy personality that went along with a formidable intelligence. He was a “standout wrestler” in high school and an “accomplished gymnast at Sacramento State” where he graduated and then got into the building trade before going on to run a contracting business and have a home proximate to Country Club Plaza.
Friends describe him as being “happy” and “sanguine” at that time in his life, when he was about age 50.
But, by 2011, when Lehmkuhl was 53, he was hearing voices in his head and his life began to fall apart. He tumbled into a homeless life, combatting demons in his head that spoke to him. The Hubert piece provides a comprehensive picture of a good man beset by a devastating condition: schizophrenia. Lehmkuhl had good friends and loyal family members…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "Cécile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the SelfWhat is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…