Skip to main content

"Justice" in Sacramento is disturbing

Yesterday, I was arraigned in Sacramento Superior Court regarding an alleged trespassing misdemeanor.1

In Department 3 that morning there were perhaps sixty other people in a circumstance similar to mine: arraignments for misdemeanor tickets.

A few [guessing: five] had attorneys they'd secured.  Others [guessing: thirty] had Public Defenders they had secured prior to the arraignment date.  Yet others, like me, came without having sought an attorney.  Those of us who had incomes of less than $2500/mo. did have a chance to get a Public Defender.

For the arraignment, we were told we could act on our own without an attorney — but this did not mean that anyone was acting as their own attorney, just that people were meant to make some important decisions, quickly, on the fly.

Those of us without attorneys were put in a circumstance such that you didn't really know what you were being charged with, yet you were told the maximum punishment and the possible costs of an unsuccessful litigation.  Then came Monty Hall.

You were given an "opportunity" to accept a beautiful deal, all wrapped up with a bow on it, coming from the DA's office.  In my case, "the deal" was that I could accept one-thirtieth the maximum jail time [six days, instead of six months]; no incarceration relating to a probation violation; and a 'stay away' from Loaves & Fishes.

With that, there's no negotiation:  Take it, or leave it.  To take the deal, you plead either No Contest or Guilty — which for someone without a subsequent civil-suit risk is a distinction without a difference (is my understanding).

What you don't know are any valuable statistics — like what penalty an average person charged with your 'crime' might receive.  Or, basically, "What might be just?"  [I recognize that that question is a doozy: It remains, perhaps forever, a large mystery as to what in the way of 'punishment' might be appropriate relating to any misdeed.  And yet.]

In our nation of incarcerating people by the multiple many millions, the highest per-capita rate in the world, and seven times the per-capita rate of any other civilized country2, having SOME REAL CONTEXT to make an important decision, like that, is, ya know, important.  Yet, people, like me, were being lured into accepting the DA's deal on what I think was greatly inadequate and likely misleading information.

Looking at my situation, the DEAL means I (seem to) get a 97%-off super-saver.  Very hard to pass up, particularly when you consider that I entered Loaves & Fishes on the day when I would be getting 86ed as a complete rube.  I didn't 'bring witnesses with me,' I wasn't prepared for anything, whereas the Loaves & Fishes people were prepared.  The DEAL, isn't just for the guilty, it's one you're supposed to take when you're innocent of the crime; you avert the chance that the Truth might not win out.  You take the deal to avoid the stain from injustice.

Basically, being homeless and subjected to the hard reality that poor people go through has been an awakening I'm grateful for.  I'm spectacularly disappointed that justice [and the world 'out here,' generally]  isn't what I was taught it was in elementary school, or [in the case of justice] from watching "Perry Mason" or "Dragnet" on TV.  It doesn't even have the "do the right thing in an imperfect world" feel of "Law & Order."

I know that the court system and DA's office are racing through things at breakneck speed to keep expenses down in these hard times of ours.  But what I witnessed and am now going through is a vast vast craziness.

Of course, what really starts to happen is that crime isn't penalized all that much, the REAL penalty is for contesting the charges.  That's loony tunes.  People are supposed to have a right to justice in this country.

BTW, I certainly, completely feel I'm innocent of the crime I'm charged with.  I stated that I was Not Guilty, and chose to represent myself in the upcoming proceedings.3 I had two lines of defense yesterday; but now I have three, the new one relating to a procedural problem that looks like a whopper.

----
1 You can find my criminal file online.  Go to saccourt.ca.gov. Hit "Search our Case Index"; then, "Proceed to Search System"; then, in 'Case type' choose "Criminal"; then enter my last [Armstrong] and first [Thomas] names.  Hit "search." Then 'select' Armstrong-Thomas-Edward.  And, finally, click 'details' for case 10M06539.

2 Per wikipedia, "The United States' incarceration rate is, according to official reports, the highest in the world, at 737 persons imprisoned per 100,000 (as of 2005). A report released in 2008 indicates that in the United States more than 1 in 100 adults is now confined in an American jail or prison. The United States has 4% of the world's population and 25% of the world's incarcerated population."  We put people in jails and prisons AN AWFUL LOT in the United States.  You'd think we were a nation of particularly terrible people.

3 I'm fairly sure I was the only person in the courtroom who wasn't taking a route of getting some kind of (supposedly!-) reduced sentence, and I'm very sure I was the only person in the courtroom going the "pro per" route, of choosing to defend himself.

[Note:  Bleak House is a Charles Dickens novel that involves a legal problem that was continued near-forever in the High Court, that ended up with lawyers' fees eating up the wealth of a great Estate.  While my proceedings won't be slow -- they'll be fast -- it is all a plenty-bleak business.]

Comments

Jennifer said…
Tom,
Good for you for actually standing up for your rights. Best of Luck!
Tom Armstrong said…
Jennifer,

Thank you enormously for your well wishes. Kindness right now means more to me than you could know.

I am happy that you found me through Our Mutual Friend4.

-- Tom

footnote:
4 Our Mutual Friend, title of another Dickens novel.

Popular posts from this blog

The devastating effects of schizophrenia in one man's life

A powerful story of the deteriorating life and death of once-respectable Sacramento citizen, Mike Lehmkuhl,  is told by  reporter Cynthia Hubert in Sunday’s [7/31/16] Bee.
Lehmkuhl is described as a very likable guy with a sometimes-goofy personality that went along with a formidable intelligence. He was a “standout wrestler” in high school and an “accomplished gymnast at Sacramento State” where he graduated and then got into the building trade before going on to run a contracting business and have a home proximate to Country Club Plaza.
Friends describe him as being “happy” and “sanguine” at that time in his life, when he was about age 50.
But, by 2011, when Lehmkuhl was 53, he was hearing voices in his head and his life began to fall apart. He tumbled into a homeless life, combatting demons in his head that spoke to him. The Hubert piece provides a comprehensive picture of a good man beset by a devastating condition: schizophrenia. Lehmkuhl had good friends and loyal family members…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the SelfWhat is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…