Skip to main content

SHOC and Safe Ground, with John Kraintz's participation, at Communist confab in Detroit

Five delegates1 from SHOC’s so-called “Homeless Leadership Project” and SafeGround [including John Kraintz, who is listed as a “participant”] were at the US Social Forum which, despite its name, was not about clog dancing, but, instead, turning our country into a communist one. The US Social Forum is a part of the People’s Movement Assembly which is a bunch of wacky, nutty far-far-far-Leftist craziness by people who are completely out of touch with the central lesson of the Twentieth Century: that Communism doesn’t work and is a bloody nightmare.

The assemblage was held in Detroit’s convention center and drew massively less than the 20,000 people the sponsors claimed.  People stayed away in droves.  But the Communist Party USA was there, one of the few groups that actually uses the C-word when advocating the C-word.

SHOC [aka, Sacramento Homeless Organizing Committee] and SafeGround [aka, Safe Ground] are the Frankenstein offspring of Loaves & Fishes and have their offices in L&F’s Friendship Park.  Both are mysterious organizations, even to those of us who frequent Homeless World Sacramento.

The only named person associated with SHOC is Paula Lomazzi, even on the page at the SHOC website where its history is given.  My experience is that attorney Cathleen Williams is the brains behind SHOC.  She has been the leader at two SHOC meetings I attended in 2009, and at the so-called Homeless Power Forum.  All of these events were in Loaves & Fishes' Delany Center.  Both Lomazzi, and more so Williams, contribute to the Communist newspaper People's Tribune. [The organization behind People's Tribune (and another publication, Rally, Comrades!) is the League of Revolutionaries for a New America, [here's the wikipedia listing] formerly named the Communist League.  One online organization identifies them as Stalinist and fervently anti-democratic [Alternate link.]

I have asked that Safe Ground meet its one public obligation [a "public inspection" requirement] to know how it is organized, by seeing its nonprofit application. [See Publication 557]  Indeed, when I visited the organization's office last March 31, Libby Fernandez was summoned to come down to talk with me and instructed me to "wait patiently." To this day, Ms. Fernandez, a member of the board of directors of Safe Ground [I think; they provide no paperwork], has not turned over that information.  Her reason given last March was that Safe Ground had not yet gotten its non-profit approval number.

At the People's Movement Assemblies website, you get this as part of the Vision Statement from their homepage [emphases, mine]:
We believe that we can create a new economic system that is not based on individual, corporate or private ownership and does not exploit people, the planet, natural resources or living beings but instead is based on principles of collectivity and sustains our communities. We must move aside old systems that have failed and create new ones that serve and are accountable to all peoples and all living beings.

We must link arms with our sisters and brothers globally and commit to a willingness to work together to seek understanding, to coordinate action and to move forward collectively with a sense of urgency to create a more just world. We acknowledge the need to break down barriers. We must integrate our national struggles for the human rights to dignity, welfare, freedom and justice.
Can you say "Communism"!?  It's not a "new economic system," it's something that has been tried two-dozen times and killed more than a hundred million people, summarily [that is, not by war, but more in the fashion of lining people up in front of trenches and giving them a bellyful from machine guns], and the death and misery continues in several countries, today.

Communism fails because it gets all the incentives to work backwards and because the all-powerful government it puts in place has no 'checks' that deter corruption.  Communism may sound good, in the abstract, but in operation it devolves into a cruel totalitarian regime.  Every time. It may be forgivable to have believed in Communism eighty years ago, but to believe in it today is insane.  The evidence of its horror is abundant.

The Leftist so-called homeless-help agencies in Sacramento are an abomination.  They are not liberal.  They are not progressive.  They are foolish totalists.  They are spending some of any contributions you give to them to try to foment a massive conflagration of terror in this country (that, granted, won't happen during the lifetimes of any of us, since so many of us know a little history).  These whacky far-Leftists in Homeless World Sacramento may be naïve.  They are certainly ridiculous, and they put in a lot of effort to do something that would be astronomically high on the stupidity scale.

Here words from the May/June edition of Rally, Comrades!:
…abolition of private property has a name. Communism is the common, public ownership of the means of production – with everyone contributing to society what he or she is able to contribute and everyone taking from society what he or she needs. Today, when computers and robots increasingly replace human labor in supplying goods and services, communism is the way to reorganize society to get food to the hungry, homes to the homeless, health care to the sick. It is the way to save Mother Earth from the corporations and to unleash the full potential of humanity.
If you don't know your history, it may sound good, but it is catastrophic.  Many people, including me, are frustrated by the abusiveness of unfettered capitalism.  But there are many, many things that can be done to address all that that doesn't put an end to freedom and democracy and checks against government abuse.

For the record:  I am not a Tea Partier, nor a hard-hearted conservative nutjob.  I am Buddhist and liberal and know something about history.
1 Update 7/9/10 the article, posted at Street News Service, online, was originally published in hardcopy in SHOC's Homeward Journal, July/August issue, buried on page 4, with Cathleen Williams cited as the writer.


Popular posts from this blog

The devastating effects of schizophrenia in one man's life

A powerful story of the deteriorating life and death of once-respectable Sacramento citizen, Mike Lehmkuhl,  is told by  reporter Cynthia Hubert in Sunday’s [7/31/16] Bee.
Lehmkuhl is described as a very likable guy with a sometimes-goofy personality that went along with a formidable intelligence. He was a “standout wrestler” in high school and an “accomplished gymnast at Sacramento State” where he graduated and then got into the building trade before going on to run a contracting business and have a home proximate to Country Club Plaza.
Friends describe him as being “happy” and “sanguine” at that time in his life, when he was about age 50.
But, by 2011, when Lehmkuhl was 53, he was hearing voices in his head and his life began to fall apart. He tumbled into a homeless life, combatting demons in his head that spoke to him. The Hubert piece provides a comprehensive picture of a good man beset by a devastating condition: schizophrenia. Lehmkuhl had good friends and loyal family members…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "Cécile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the SelfWhat is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…