Skip to main content

Bad credit doesn't make for bad employees

[graphic from Buffalo News]
An article in the New York Times today tells us this…
…researchers say there is no evidence showing that people with weak credit are more likely to be bad employees or to steal from their bosses…
Eric Rosenberg of the TransUnion credit bureau said, in testamony before Oregon legislators last January, "At this point we don’t have any research to show any statistical correlation between what’s in somebody’s credit report and their job performance or their likelihood to commit fraud.”

The article, "As a Hiring Filter, Credit Checks Draw Questions," tells us that legislatures in states across the country are now thinking about restricting or disallowing the use of credit reports in hiring determinations. A bill has been introduced in California, but is now stalled "because of opposition from credit bureaus and other businesses."

In the U.S. Government, too, there is interest in stopping employers' practices of using credit information to filter out resumes. Rep. Steve Cohen, a Tennessee Democrat, hopes to introduce legislation he is set to author to that effect.

Further, the article tells us the practice of using credit checks "unfairly tars the huge pool of people whose credit was damaged by layoffs, medical bills or other factors beyond their control. They also say it disproportionately screens out minorities."

Too, credit checks screen out capable homeless people who are seeking jobs in order to put their lives back together.  What a great shame it is that people most in need of employment are now being screened from getting employment by a means [ie, credit checks] that has no meaning in determining who might be the best employee.

A great many homeless people, having directly, personally suffered deprevations are especially motivated to be outstanding employees.

A recent post in California Credit Law blog, "Bad Credit Can Mean No Job," tells us this…
…The [Wall Street Journal] reports that 47% of employers check credit history for at least some positions. Most do so with respect to jobs with fiduciary or financial responsibility or for senior positions.

Employers can legally check credit if the applicant authorizes them to do so. Employment agencies point out that if the applicant refuses, there is little chance of getting a job.

Credit checks create a vicious cycle that prevents those who most need jobs from getting hired. At least one bill in Congress and some in the state legislatures would restrict credit checks except for specified positions.

Comments

BlueLady said…
It's about time this issue got wider audience. We awful liberals have been talking about this issue, using credit worthiness to hire someone/ or to use it for any reason at all other than asking for a loan/ simply gives too much power to the banksters. It's too bad our brother and sister Americans, those conservatives and others on the right, have been too busy hating us to look at the issues.

Let's hope that some solidarity can be reached by bringing all sides of working Americans together on this issue and put a stop to the big brother of corporations ruling our lives.
Tom Armstrong said…
Thanks for you wonderful comment, BlueLady! I agree with all that you've written.

I think that it is also true that people born into wealth get too much of a 'leg up' in the employment game. We simply must have a government that does a better job looking out for the little people.

The poor have enough difficulty. For us to be discriminated against on bases that have no merit whatsoever is an abomination.
Devid said…
Here is lots of useful information about Bank Accounts For Bad Credit also you can directly apply for prepaid mastercard, credit cards and debit cards.

Popular posts from this blog

The devastating effects of schizophrenia in one man's life

A powerful story of the deteriorating life and death of once-respectable Sacramento citizen, Mike Lehmkuhl,  is told by  reporter Cynthia Hubert in Sunday’s [7/31/16] Bee.
Lehmkuhl is described as a very likable guy with a sometimes-goofy personality that went along with a formidable intelligence. He was a “standout wrestler” in high school and an “accomplished gymnast at Sacramento State” where he graduated and then got into the building trade before going on to run a contracting business and have a home proximate to Country Club Plaza.
Friends describe him as being “happy” and “sanguine” at that time in his life, when he was about age 50.
But, by 2011, when Lehmkuhl was 53, he was hearing voices in his head and his life began to fall apart. He tumbled into a homeless life, combatting demons in his head that spoke to him. The Hubert piece provides a comprehensive picture of a good man beset by a devastating condition: schizophrenia. Lehmkuhl had good friends and loyal family members…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "Cécile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the SelfWhat is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…