Skip to main content

A Moveable Sleep


I received an email, today, from Joan Burke, Director of Advocacy, of Loaves & Fishes, signed by both Ms. Burke and attorney Mark Merin. The gist of it is this paragraph that was in bold in the center of the text:
We are asking owners of empty lots, parking lots and any other unused space to permit homeless campers to pitch tents on their property for ONE NIGHT. The “campers” will clean up the property and leave it in better condition than they found it; a porta-potty will be provided. The “campers” will then move to the next property owner’s property where they will pitch their tents, again, for ONE NIGHT.
By having homeless campers be constantly on the move in a rotation of camping sites, they don't break the anti-camping ordinance. Unhappily, this is perhaps the only way left for unsheltered homeless people to stay within the law. [Shelter space is tight! Unconscionably, the police rousted campsites throughout the city on the 11th just before the big storm, putting people's lives in disarray. I, myself, couldn't get a shelter bed and was "on the street" on the two rainy nights of Oct 12th-13th and 13th-14th. I was probably in violation of the law.]

For more info or to allow use of your property for this effort, call or email Mark Merin at 916-443-6911, mark@markmerin.com or Joan Burke at 916-446-0874, advocate4loaves@yahoo.com .
-----
Update 10/15 @ 2:30pm: According to a Bee article today:
Sacramento police spokeswoman Officer Laura Peck said the department has been working with community leaders and homeless advocates to address the issue [of camping space for homeless people]. …

"The intent of the camping ordinance is to prevent camping within the city limits," Peck said. "If the community provides locations for these folks to camp and they don't stay in the same location for more than one day, they are still violating the intent of that law.

"However, it is not as though we are not compassionate to the problem. It is not as though [we] are going to go out and target these things."

… [Joan Burke] said that the ordinance states a person cannot camp in one place for more than 24 consecutive hours.

"It's pretty explicit."
I believe I understand from the article that Joan Burke's reading of the ordinance is that it is crafted explicitly in such a way that, whether or not there was any underlying intent, the law amounts to just a definative rule that homeless campers may strive to satisfy.  If they satisfy the rule of the ordiance, meeting the 24-hour limitation per location, their action in camping continually in Sacramento would be legal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The devastating effects of schizophrenia in one man's life

A powerful story of the deteriorating life and death of once-respectable Sacramento citizen, Mike Lehmkuhl,  is told by  reporter Cynthia Hubert in Sunday’s [7/31/16] Bee.
Lehmkuhl is described as a very likable guy with a sometimes-goofy personality that went along with a formidable intelligence. He was a “standout wrestler” in high school and an “accomplished gymnast at Sacramento State” where he graduated and then got into the building trade before going on to run a contracting business and have a home proximate to Country Club Plaza.
Friends describe him as being “happy” and “sanguine” at that time in his life, when he was about age 50.
But, by 2011, when Lehmkuhl was 53, he was hearing voices in his head and his life began to fall apart. He tumbled into a homeless life, combatting demons in his head that spoke to him. The Hubert piece provides a comprehensive picture of a good man beset by a devastating condition: schizophrenia. Lehmkuhl had good friends and loyal family members…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "Cécile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the SelfWhat is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…