Skip to main content

Where's the Beef?

Without skipping a beat, the Sacramento Bee editorial board has gone from November 5th's Editorial: Mayoral arrogance hampers progress to November 6th's Editorial: A step forward on homelessness. Mayor Johnson is damned because "his arrogant go-it-alone style hurts the very goals he's trying to achieve" and then, the next day, praised because "…[b]eyond housing, he wants accountability, a way to continuously evaluate and optimize housing and services."

Mayor Johnson is all things such that on the whole, in the Bee's board's appraisal, he has no solid features of governance that last beyond twenty-four hours.

But, actually, the good-hearted mayor IS consistant (and I don't mean consistantly inconsistant). He's consistant thus: He likes hoopla and being a visionary, but muffs the details. "The devil is in the details," it's said, as if tiny little details muck up everything. But, in scrutinizing the mayor's performance, the details are everything. They are everything that is missing. And they being missing means there's not much there, if anything.

Unconscionably, the mayor is getting high praise for his promise to bring 2400 units of housing to conquer homelessness, but brings only his pie-in-the-sky proposal, and no pathway to show how it can happen. It is also, to my mind, NOT the way to go in the first place, and foolish because there is no route for pulling together a constituancy for such a mamouth and expensive scheme to make it achievable. Politics is the art of the POSSIBLE. The impossible doesn't happen.

A quarter century ago, the phrase "Where's the beef?" came into political parlance when Walter Mondale said to an opponent in a primary, "When I hear your new ideas, I'm reminded of that [Wendy's Restaurant television] commercial, 'Where's the beef?'" The meaning was that the opponent had platitudes, but no substance.

THAT may be what's consistent about Johnson. On the the 5th, the Bee damned his non-substance. On the 6th, the Bee praised his platitudes. Unfortunately for the mayor, for the homeless, and for the city it is SUBSTANCE that matters, overriding all the claptrap.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The devastating effects of schizophrenia in one man's life

A powerful story of the deteriorating life and death of once-respectable Sacramento citizen, Mike Lehmkuhl,  is told by  reporter Cynthia Hubert in Sunday’s [7/31/16] Bee.
Lehmkuhl is described as a very likable guy with a sometimes-goofy personality that went along with a formidable intelligence. He was a “standout wrestler” in high school and an “accomplished gymnast at Sacramento State” where he graduated and then got into the building trade before going on to run a contracting business and have a home proximate to Country Club Plaza.
Friends describe him as being “happy” and “sanguine” at that time in his life, when he was about age 50.
But, by 2011, when Lehmkuhl was 53, he was hearing voices in his head and his life began to fall apart. He tumbled into a homeless life, combatting demons in his head that spoke to him. The Hubert piece provides a comprehensive picture of a good man beset by a devastating condition: schizophrenia. Lehmkuhl had good friends and loyal family members…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "C├ęcile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the SelfWhat is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…